W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > July 2008

Re: Doubts about the proposal to resolve ISSUE-5 [WAS: Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda]

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 21:13:23 +0100
Message-Id: <2C3E3F08-4C59-4C34-98A1-8A7497C3BF29@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: "OWL 1.1" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
To: "Michael Schneider" <schneid@fzi.de>

On Jul 8, 2008, at 8:57 PM, Michael Schneider wrote:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg- 
>> request@w3.org]
>> On Behalf Of Ian Horrocks
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 9:19 PM
>> To: OWL 1.1
>> Subject: Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda
>
> [...]
>
>>           o Proposals to Resolve Issues
>>                 + Issue 5 Doubts about n-ary datatypes, per Bijan's
>> email and Evan's email
>
> The two referenced emails both refer to proposals to resolve  
> ISSUE-53, not
> ISSUE-5. And I can't remember that there was already a proposal to  
> resolve
> ISSUE-5. What's the current situation?

They also refer to ISSUE-5 in the bodies.

http://www.w3.org/mid/D445206D-CCE8-4D46-84AA-3F1130400475@cs.man.ac.uk

There was a proposal to subsume ISSUE-53 under ISSUE-5, Evan and I  
suggested closing ISSUE-5 for separate reasons.

Cheers,
Bijan.
Received on Tuesday, 8 July 2008 20:14:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:05 UTC