- From: Jie Bao <baojie@cs.rpi.edu>
- Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:51:50 -0400
- To: "Web Ontology Language ((OWL)) Working Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Thanks. As I compare the OWL use case document [1] and the proposed OWL 2 use case document, there is a notable difference. The OWL use cases emphasized on applications that are directly web related, e.g., web portals. The OWL2 use cases, on the other hand, have the majority from domain applications, e.g., Health care and Life Science. While domain applications will be for certain among the leading application scenarios for OWL2, new web applications that got popular after OWL was designed, e.g., Web 2.0, web services, linked data, online video, webtop, etc., may also need more considerations. I believe it will be helpful to invite more use cases from those web applications. The working group might need to come up with a way to attract more use case contributions from the web domain (e.g., from .com companies), not only by public calls, but also by more targeted contacts and advertisements. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/PR-webont-req-20031215 Jie On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Evan Wallace <ewallace@cme.nist.gov> wrote: > > > All, > > A frozen copy of the evolving OWL2 Requirements document is now available > for > review [1] and comment at the upcoming face-to-face meeting. While there is > now > quite a bit of content, it is still very much a work in progress. For > example, we still > haven't reached consensus on the exact structure which has resulted in two > Use Cases > sections. We would appreciate feedback on this and other aspects of the > document. > > -Evan > > Evan K. Wallace > Manufacturing Systems Integration Division > NIST > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/ED-owl2-requirements-20080722 > > >
Received on Monday, 28 July 2008 01:52:27 UTC