- From: Evan Wallace <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 10:59:40 -0400
- To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- CC: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, "OWL 1.1" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
> > On Jul 2, 2008, at 6:05 AM, Ian Horrocks wrote: > >> This issue seems to be subsumed by issue-5, and I suggest we close it. > > I concur, though we should add a note to issue-5 noting that. > > Best, > Alan > Really? Issue 5 expresses concerns about the proposed solution for N-ary datatypes, while issue 53 provides a clear example (use case) for N-ary inequality support of type 3 from Bijan's N-ary update [1]. The use case is still potentially relevant even if a particular solution is rejected. Of course, if we accept a solution along the lines described by Bijan, then it would resolve both issues. -Evan [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Jul/0047.html
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2008 15:00:32 UTC