- From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 07:55:51 +0100
- To: "'Dave Peterson'" <davep@iit.edu>, <paul@sparrow-hawk.org>, "'Alan Ruttenberg'" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Cc: "'Rob Shearer'" <rob.shearer@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, <public-webont-comments@w3.org>, <public-owl-wg@w3.org>, <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
> It's also violated within XML > Schema itself - " xx " as an instance of xs:token maps to a different value from " > xx " as an xs:string. > > Not so. ' xx ' is not in the lexical space of token. Well, yes, but isn't that just a fig-leaf to hide the fact that the principle has been violated in spirit? What exactly is the practical benefit / intent of the principle, and is this benefit still achieved if it applies to the intermediate lexical form rather than the raw lexical form? Michael Kay
Received on Wednesday, 9 July 2008 06:56:38 UTC