RE: ISSUE-132 (constant2literal): Replace usage of "constant" with "literal" as defined by RDF and XML. [editorial] from Boris Motik on 2008-07-01 (public-owl-wg@w3.org from July 2008)

From: Boris Motik <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 20:02:23 +0100
To: "'OWL Working Group WG'" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <007d01c8dbac$febee3c0$7212a8c0@wolf>

I support this and will gladly do it.

Regards,

	Boris

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of OWL Working
> Group Issue Tracker
> Sent: 01 July 2008 20:00
> To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
> Subject: ISSUE-132 (constant2literal): Replace usage of "constant" with "literal" as defined by RDF
> and XML. [editorial]
> 
> 
> 
> ISSUE-132 (constant2literal): Replace usage of "constant" with "literal" as defined by RDF and XML.
> [editorial]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/
> 
> Raised by: Alan Ruttenberg
> On product:
> 
> Constant, as used in the spec, appears to mean exactly the same as Literal, in the XML sense. Using
> the already defined terms might make the terminology more consistent.
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 1 July 2008 19:03:57 UTC