- From: Michael Smith <msmith@clarkparsia.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 07:50:11 -0400
- To: public-owl-wg <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 12:27 +0100, Uli Sattler wrote: > the 'easy' support for time that I was advocating yesterday seems to > fit in nicely with this: > > - absence of a time zone (so I guess we would only support a > *restriction* of xsd:dateTime, but this should be ok) I think we either need all constants to have a timezone, or none. I prefer the first based on the assumption that more data "in the wild" has timezones, and that such data is more completely defined. > - the value space is continuous (since seconds are decimals between 0 > and 60, according to my reading of Mike's [1]) and therefor, from an > algorithms perspective, isomorphic to owl:number and thus it shouldn't > be too much of a burden on the implementors. Agreed. -- Mike Smith Clark & Parsia
Received on Thursday, 24 July 2008 11:51:00 UTC