W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > July 2008

RE: Issue-114

From: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 15:06:07 +0200
Message-ID: <0EF30CAA69519C4CB91D01481AEA06A0A26114@judith.fzi.de>
To: "Bijan Parsia" <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: "OWL Working Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Bijan Parsia wrote:

>Thus, in the absence of a concrete technical motivation, I think we
>should close it. Indeed, absent some evidence of significant WG
>support, I think we shouldn't expend more WG resource on it.
>Obviously, continued scrutiny is warranted, as always, but I don't
>think the current discussion has passed the bar yet.
>I would support putting back object/data punning, for that matter.
>The objections there were primarily motivated by syntactic problems
>in *one* (important) serialization. That's unfortunate, not happy

And Class/Datatype punning? That's disallowed, too, at the moment [1].



Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2008 13:09:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:05 UTC