W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > July 2008

Re: Issue-114

From: Evan Wallace <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 12:02:38 -0400
Message-ID: <486A551E.7070701@cme.nist.gov>
CC: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>

As I said when we discussed this in January, combining properties and 
classes is common in
some models.  UML supports this with the Association Class construct, 
and I saw this construct
used liberally in models at last week's OMG meeting.  It is also true 
that it is common to encounter
the problem of integrating models after the fact that have made 
different design choices leading
to a need to reconcile the use of both classes and properties for the 
same concept.   As long as
we are going to include punning in the OWL2 language, then we should 
have a darn good reason if
we are not going to support class-property punning.

Received on Tuesday, 1 July 2008 16:03:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:05 UTC