- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 18:55:59 -0400 (EDT)
- To: ewallace@cme.nist.gov
- Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
Hmm. I expect that the minutes are a factual representation of the discussion, but some of the discussion does not appear to me to be correct. Section 2.1.1: ISSUE-16 Entity Annotations The issue raiser was Jeremy Carroll. The issue itself is about the ability to annotate an entity annotation (because it is an axiom) but not other annotations (because they are not axioms). I did put forward a group of proposals to close the issue in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Jan/0106.html a subset of which allow annotations on annotations, which requires only a very small change to the functional syntax. The situation in the RDF syntax would be a bit more complex, but I believe that simply using the same treatment as for single-triple axioms would work (the annotated annotation would be reified and the annotations on "hung" off the reification node). There was support for one of my proposals (2a), which is the one that I also prefer. peter PS: My proposal was very different from the one put forward by Boris.
Received on Thursday, 3 July 2008 22:56:35 UTC