- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:10:34 +0100
- To: public-owl-wg Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Good feedback on EL++. Begin forwarded message: > Resent-From: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > From: John Madden <john.madden@me.com> > Date: 24 July 2008 23:23:09 BDT > To: Christine Golbreich <cgolbrei@gmail.com> > Cc: w3c semweb HCLS <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org> > Subject: Re: Clinical terminologies to OWL > Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/F0A0C6C8- > C569-41CE-8664-4B3262C6017A@me.com> > > > Hi Christine, > > >> >> EL++, which may shortly >> become a new 'profile' of OWL 2 that is, a sublanguage of the >> standard. > > That's really interesting to hear, and would be a very welcome > development!!! > > I have to admit I was not aware of these effort to allow OWL 1.1 > etc. to contain EL++ as a sublogic until looking at Kent's paper > cited by Jyoti, your notes, and now a few minutes snooping around > on the OWL site. > > I have to say this is all wonderful news that makes this whole > project even more timely! > > John Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Friday, 25 July 2008 13:08:15 UTC