RE: ISSUE-31 Proposal to resolve

>-----Original Message-----
>From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org]
>On Behalf Of Ian Horrocks
>Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 11:55 AM
>To: OWL 1.1
>Subject: ISSUE-31 Proposal to resolve
>
>
>Isn't this issue moot now that we have defined our own OWL detatype
>restriction syntax?
>
>This being the case we could close the issue without any action.
>
>Ian

Neither do I really understand what ISSUE-31 is about, nor do I understand
why having own OWL datatypes (such as owl:real?) makes this issue moot. Can
anyone please provide a short explanation of ISSUE-31?

Thanks,
Michael