public-html@w3.org from September 2009 by author

=JeffH

• fyi: Strict Transport Security specification (Saturday, 19 September)

Adrian Bateman

• RE: ISSUE-41/ACTION-97 decentralized-extensibility (Wednesday, 30 September)
• RE: HTML WG Testing Task Force (Wednesday, 23 September)
• RE: <keygen> element (Thursday, 17 September)
• RE: <keygen> element (Tuesday, 8 September)
• RE: <keygen> element (Tuesday, 8 September)
• RE: <video> and <audio> (Tuesday, 8 September)
• RE: <keygen> element (Wednesday, 2 September)
• RE: <keygen> element (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• <video> and <audio> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• New <input> types (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• <keygen> element (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Tuesday, 1 September)
• <dialog> element (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) (Tuesday, 1 September)

Alexandre Alapetite

• Re: Rel="first" and "index" breaks specs and implementations (Tuesday, 1 September)

Allen Wirfs-Brock

• RE: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Sunday, 27 September)
• RE: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Sunday, 27 September)
• RE: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Saturday, 26 September)
• RE: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Saturday, 26 September)
• RE: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Saturday, 26 September)
• RE: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Friday, 25 September)

Andrew Fedoniouk

• Re: [html5] input type=time & min/max. (Saturday, 19 September)
• [html5] input type=time & min/max. (Saturday, 19 September)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: CfC: Create HTML Accessibility Task Force (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: What attributes are required on the <sytle> element? (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: <details> (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: guidance location? [was: Re: <details> ] (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: <details> (Monday, 14 September)
• <details> (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: how many URL issues do we need/want? (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog> (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: <video> and <audio> (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: what is the spec telling authors about missing link/@rel? (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: picking up on some comments in IRC on ARIA (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Tuesday, 1 September)

Aryeh Gregor

• Re: ISSUE-41/ACTION-97 decentralized-extensibility (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: itemheader names <h> (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: The Complexity Argument (was: Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: FW: [html] Summary draft (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Sunday, 6 September)
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers (Sunday, 6 September)
• Re: The History of <aside> for sidebars (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: The History of <aside> for sidebars (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) (Tuesday, 1 September)

Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis

• Re: aria vs native alternatives [was: Re: feedback requested on WAI CG Consensus Resolutions on Text alternatives in HTML 5 document] (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: aria vs native alternatives [was: Re: feedback requested on WAI CG Consensus Resolutions on Text alternatives in HTML 5 document] (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: aria vs native alternatives [was: Re: feedback requested on WAI CG Consensus Resolutions on Text alternatives in HTML 5 document] (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: aria vs native alternatives [was: Re: feedback requested on WAI CG Consensus Resolutions on Text alternatives in HTML 5 document] (Wednesday, 2 September)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: WebIDL (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: WebIDL (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [HTML5] DOMContentLoaded fires before CSS resources loaded? (Sunday, 6 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Tuesday, 1 September)

Brendan Eich

• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: WebIDL (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: WebIDL (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: WebIDL (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Thursday, 24 September)

Bruce Lawson

• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: <details> (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: The History of <aside> for sidebars (was: Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Tuesday, 1 September)

bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

• [Bug 7776] rename appcache events? (Wednesday, 30 September)
• [Bug 7765] Maybe progress should be named fetchcachefile or some such (Wednesday, 30 September)
• [Bug 7727] legacy doc type does not need to be discouraged by "SHOULD NOT" (Wednesday, 30 September)
• [Bug 7760] appcache event summary for error is wrong (Tuesday, 29 September)
• [Bug 7757] The "application cache update process" does not take a browsing context as argument. Do you mean the pass the active document as cache host? It should be more explicit about what is what. (Tuesday, 29 September)
• [Bug 7759] The "application cache update process" does not take a single application cache as argument. It takes an application cache group. This means the "If document was loaded from an application cache" step is wrong. (Tuesday, 29 September)
• [Bug 7727] legacy doc type does not need to be discouraged by "SHOULD NOT" (Tuesday, 29 September)
• [Bug 7734] open being an attribute of the section rather than the content area means you can never use this to mark up content which has multiple control/detail areas which are opened or closed independently like tabs or accordion (Tuesday, 29 September)
• [Bug 7735] perhaps open could be an int rather than boolean, indicating which content area was open to make using this model for tabs easier (Tuesday, 29 September)
• [Bug 7736] add tooltip attribute & keep title for other uses (Tuesday, 29 September)
• [Bug 7740] Authoring advice for canvas is bad for accessibility (Tuesday, 29 September)
• [Bug 7744] Is sniffing required? (Tuesday, 29 September)
• [Bug 7746] <link rel=search> should be used instead of <input type=search> for backwards-compatibility and beacuse the search input type poses no additional input restrictions. (Tuesday, 29 September)
• [Bug 7633] The use of @summary should be encouraged when circumstances warrant (Tuesday, 29 September)
• [Bug 7512] suggested "replacement" for head/@profile does not work (Tuesday, 29 September)
• [Bug 7657] Redefining dt and dd (Tuesday, 29 September)
• [Bug 7011] [in off-bug discussion] canvas accessible fallback provision is under specified (Monday, 28 September)
• [Bug 7542] Remove Section 5. Microdata (Thursday, 24 September)
• [Bug 7687] Use "representation" instead of "resource" in �6.9 (Thursday, 24 September)
• [Bug 7688] 'input type=time' forbids legitimate use case (Thursday, 24 September)
• [Bug 7689] Cache-defeating semantics are not defined (Thursday, 24 September)
• [Bug 7690] Incompletely defined priority of fallback over explicit entries (Thursday, 24 September)
• [Bug 6853] restore meta keywords, search engines use them (Thursday, 24 September)
• [Bug 7704] It is better to implement canvas.clear() method and allow to resize canvas without clearing it (Thursday, 24 September)
• [Bug 7715] Tests not archived (Thursday, 24 September)
• [Bug 7709] Prevent PUT/DELETE cross-origin (Wednesday, 23 September)
• [Bug 7682] link tag: rel: associate pages about the same organization across many sites (Monday, 21 September)
• [Bug 7681] link tag: rel: associate pages about the same person across many sites (Monday, 21 September)
• [Bug 7362] inclusion of the title as a case where the alt may be omitted is problematic (Monday, 21 September)
• [Bug 7400] "as part" instead of "sa part" (Sunday, 20 September)
• [Bug 7674] are the chunks for inputs having the content-type header for each chunk specified appropriately? e.g. file inputs should set the header according to the file selected by the user (Sunday, 20 September)
• [Bug 7677] Is there any behavior defined for setting the src property. For example, is the expectation that object should (A) load the src if autobuffer is true (B) stop playing if currently playing (C) something else (D) nothing at all? (Sunday, 20 September)
• [Bug 7680] Add an 'angle' element to HTML5 (Sunday, 20 September)
• [Bug 7659] Clarify what "other applicable specifications" means to say http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Sep/0045.html (Friday, 18 September)
• [Bug 7672] </p> shouldn't be ignored in "before html", "before head", "in head", "in head noscript", "after head". It should be reprocessed through to "in body" like </br>. (Friday, 18 September)
• [Bug 7662] When images are disabled arguably fallback content of the <canvas> element should be shown. (Friday, 18 September)
• [Bug 7668] 7.9.6 should explain which events are actually dispatched when copying/cutting/pasting (Friday, 18 September)
• [Bug 7669] Redefining dt and dd, recommend new element as caption for Figure (Friday, 18 September)
• [Bug 7670] Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology (Friday, 18 September)
• [Bug 7660] The resource selection algorithm should set currentSrc in the sync section before invoking resource fetch instead of being set in the async resource fetch. Otherwise checking currentSrc in onloadstart is not reliable. (Thursday, 17 September)
• [Bug 7632] Should resource selection algorithm be run when src="" is removed? (Thursday, 17 September)
• [Bug 7628] The later 'block' box container should simply map to the first/last dd element. This makes UA implementations easier and script emulation of the feature in contemporary UAs as well. Both can simply toggle the display property between block and none. (Thursday, 17 September)
• [Bug 7629] When the dd element is used inside figure and details it should probably not have margin by default. (Thursday, 17 September)
• [Bug 7631] Don't invoke resource selection algorithm when inserting <source> if src="" is present (Thursday, 17 September)
• [Bug 7633] The use of @summary should be encouraged when circumstances warrant (Thursday, 17 September)
• [Bug 7646] Media Queries (Thursday, 17 September)
• [Bug 7649] It would be useful to see an example of how section works when it's not in the context of an article, in the example text (chapters, tabs, etc) all of those would sit inside a wrapping article element. (Thursday, 17 September)
• [Bug 7651] Articles and sections (Thursday, 17 September)
• [Bug 7656] Describe differences between easily confused new elements to assist authors (Thursday, 17 September)
• [Bug 7599] Either drop the two places that set the "Origin" HTTP header, or update HTML5 to match the Sec-From/Origin I-D (if the latter is stable enough yet). (Thursday, 17 September)
• [Bug 7657] Redefining dt and dd (Thursday, 17 September)
• [Bug 7643] Why not use display:none instead of overflow:hidden; height:0? display:none seems to have the desired behavior in terms of exposure to AT and keyboard navigation in browsers. (Wednesday, 16 September)
• [Bug 7642] which attribute wins if both pointsize and size are specified? (Wednesday, 16 September)
• [Bug 7645] associate printable pages and less-convenient-to-print pages with link rel value "print" (Wednesday, 16 September)
• [Bug 7639] Please remove "dc" and "ds" from the parser (Tuesday, 15 September)
• [Bug 7615] Whitespace in doctype (Monday, 14 September)
• [Bug 7616] Move requirement about obsolete doctypes (Monday, 14 September)
• [Bug 7551] People are using <section> incorrectly (Thursday, 10 September)
• [Bug 7556] Where is it defined that only the first <base> element is to be taken into account? Surely that should not be part of iri-bis. (Thursday, 10 September)
• [Bug 7557] add "type" attribute to <nav> distinguish between primary and secondary navigation (Wednesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 7550] The invalid event does have a default action. Namely to display UI. However, UAs should probably not be forbidden to show that a field is invalid before submitting, but how can page author suppress the UI for that? (Wednesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 7547] on .drawImage() negative widths or heights should flip/mirror the image. There's no easy way of fliping images in canvas (Wednesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 7546] "HTML 5" Editor's draft misnamed and suboptimal for HTML content authors unless refactored into HTML (main) and DOM API (appendix). (Wednesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 7543] Consensus on ietf-http-wg was that repetition of relations is meaningless and we should rather use numbering (e.g. "up2"), names (e.g. "great-grandparent") or an attribute (e.g. level="3"). (Wednesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 7542] Remove Section 5. Microdata (Wednesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 7540] Spec for metadata extensions does not define which states are allowed/conforming (Wednesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 7527] Allow implementations to generate meaningful default, implied headings for some sections. (Wednesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 7525] meta/@name=keywords should be specified (and made conforming) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 7512] suggested "replacement" for head/@profile does not work (Wednesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 7510] Allow elements beyond just HTML, MathML, and SVG into SVG element (Wednesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog> (Wednesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 7508] <dialog> needs a way to add non-speech related information (Wednesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 7392] Please use some term other than "URL" for Web Addresses (Tuesday, 8 September)
• [Bug 7499] <keygen> should not be defined as a requirement for a conforming HTML5 user agent and should be removed from the spec (Friday, 4 September)
• [Bug 7491] Unspecified: quotation punctuation in the blockquote element (Thursday, 3 September)
• [Bug 7484] head/@profile holds a white-space separated list of URIs (Thursday, 3 September)
• [Bug 7483] The footer element desperately needs to be able to contain sectioning content descendents, most importantly "nav". Under the current specification, I will just end up using div class="footer" so my footers can contain sectioning content. (Thursday, 3 September)
• [Bug 7480] use of keygen should trigger a warning. (Wednesday, 2 September)

Cameron McCormack

• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: WebIDL (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: WebIDL (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: WebIDL (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: WebIDL (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Friday, 25 September)
• Conformance of SVG content in HTML (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Tuesday, 1 September)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: Accessibility Task Force (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: Accessibility Task Force (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: closing issue-30 longdesc in favor of aria-describedby [was: Consolidated issues ...] (Wednesday, 2 September)

Chris Cressman

• Elements used to scope <address> (Wednesday, 2 September)

Cynthia Shelly

• RE: aria mappings (Friday, 25 September)
• FW: [html] Summary draft (Monday, 14 September)
• [aapi] RE: picking up on some comments in IRC on ARIA (Wednesday, 2 September)

Dailey, David P.

• Very nice talk about HTML5 (Sunday, 27 September)

Dan Connolly

• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: HTML WG Testing Task Force (Thursday, 10 September)
• how many URL issues doe we need/want? Re: Agenda for HTML WG telcon 2009-09-10 - Accessibility TF, Testing TF, etc (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: what is the spec telling authors about missing link/@rel? (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: what is the spec telling authors about missing link/@rel? (Thursday, 3 September)
• what is the spec telling authors about missing link/@rel? (Thursday, 3 September)

David Bolter

• Re: picking up on some comments in IRC on ARIA (Wednesday, 2 September)

David Singer

• Re: Pre-TPAC HTML5 Video Accessibility Workshop November 1 (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: video size when aspect ratio is not 1 (Friday, 18 September)

Don Brutzman

• X3D references for HTML5 draft (Thursday, 17 September)

Doug Schepers

• New Scripting Coordination List Set Up (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (Thursday, 24 September)
• Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Moving Form Events from DOM3 Events to HTML5 (was: Removing Form Events?) (Monday, 21 September)

Dundas, Alan

• RE: <keygen> element (Friday, 25 September)
• RE: <keygen> element (Wednesday, 23 September)
• RE: <keygen> element (Tuesday, 22 September)

Edward O'Connor

• Re: Speakers in Dialogues (Was: what is dt?) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: Accessibility Task Force (Thursday, 10 September)
• ARIA's role="" attribute (was Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog>) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: what is the spec telling authors about missing link/@rel? (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers (Wednesday, 2 September)

Elliott Sprehn

• Re: Localized decimal separator for numbers in <meter> textContent (Monday, 28 September)
• Localized decimal separator for numbers in <meter> textContent (Monday, 28 September)

Eric Eggert

• Re: Speakers in Dialogues (Was: what is dt?) (Tuesday, 15 September)

Giorgio Maone

• Re: [whatwg] fyi: Strict Transport Security specification (Sunday, 20 September)

Gregory J. Rosmaita

• Re: CfC: Publish HTML+RDFa as First Public Working Draft (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: DIALOG Issues Which Have Already Been Submitted as Proposals (includes DL) (Thursday, 17 September)
• DIALOG Issues Which Have Already Been Submitted as Proposals (includes DL) (Thursday, 17 September)

Henri Sivonen

• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [html] Summary draft (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Scripts that promise not to document.write() (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: Authoring Requirements for Using SVG and MathML in HTML Documents (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: aria vs native alternatives [was: Re: feedback requested on WAI CG Consensus Resolutions on Text alternatives in HTML 5 document] (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: aria vs native alternatives [was: Re: feedback requested on WAI CG Consensus Resolutions on Text alternatives in HTML 5 document] (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: aria vs native alternatives [was: Re: feedback requested on WAI CG Consensus Resolutions on Text alternatives in HTML 5 document] (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: tweaking meter [was: Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5)] (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: noscript in HTML fragment serialization algorithm (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: Questions arising from ARIA/HTML5 integration (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Tuesday, 1 September)

Ian Hickson

• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: Removing <source> should make resource selection not fire 'error' on it (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: WebIDL (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: WebIDL (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: [html5] input type=time & min/max. (Sunday, 20 September)
• Re: Complexity of HTML5 (was Re: The Complexity Argument) (Sunday, 20 September)
• Reopening bugs (Was: The Complexity Argument) (Sunday, 20 September)
• Re: [html5] input type=time & min/max. (Sunday, 20 September)
• Re: Serialization of PI misses ending question mark (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: [html5] input type=time & min/max. (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: Serialization of PI misses ending question mark (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: ACTION-103 Follow up on the about: scheme Registration (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: The Complexity Argument (was: Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD) (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: Google to pay for HTMLWG invited experts at TPAC 2009 (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: <details> (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: video size when aspect ratio is not 1 (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: Speakers in Dialogues (Was: what is dt?) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: <details> (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: FW: [html] Summary draft (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: 4.10.4.1.5 E-mail state (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: 4.10.4.1.5 E-mail state (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: video size when aspect ratio is not 1 (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Sunday, 6 September)
• Re: tweaking meter (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: meter changes [was: Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5] (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: noscript in HTML fragment serialization algorithm (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: Questions arising from ARIA/HTML5 integration (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: Questions arising from ARIA/HTML5 integration (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: Issues arising from not reparsing (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: The formatblock command (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: what is the spec telling authors about missing link/@rel? (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: Please Specify Behavior for @rel="next | prev" (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: Please Specify Behavior for @rel="next | prev" (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: video size when aspect ratio is not 1 (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: video: earliest possible position changes (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [html5] Event handler DOM attributes (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: drawImage() shouldn't throw INVALID_STATE_ERR (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: Proposal: <content> element (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: question about ARIA in HTML 5 spec text - implied use on elements not listed (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: noscript in HTML fragment serialization algorithm (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 (Tuesday, 1 September)

Ivan Herman

• Re: XMLLiterals and c14n (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: XMLLiterals and c14n (Monday, 7 September)

James Craig

• please don't cross-post to the pfwg-comments (Was: aria-describedby vs longdesc [was: Re: Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support]) (Tuesday, 15 September)

James Graham

• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Thursday, 24 September)
• WindowProxy (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Monday, 21 September)
• Drag and Drop API (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: Please Specify Behavior for @rel="next | prev" (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: Proposal: <content> element (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers (Wednesday, 2 September)

Janina Sajka

• Re: Accessibility Task Force (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: Accessibility Task Force (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: Accessibility Task Force (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: Accessibility Task Force (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: Accessibility Task Force (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: Accessibility Task Force (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: Accessibility Task Force (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: Accessibility Task Force (Wednesday, 9 September)

janina@rednote.net

• RE: Create HTML Accessibility Task Force (Wednesday, 30 September)

Jeff Schiller

• Re: What attributes are required on the <sytle> element? (Wednesday, 23 September)
• What attributes are required on the <sytle> element? (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Monday, 7 September)

Jens Meiert

• Re: [html5] Event handler DOM attributes (Friday, 4 September)

Jeremy Keith

• Re: what is dt? (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: Feature detection (was: <details>) (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Monday, 14 September)

Jim Jewett

• Re: aria mappings (Thursday, 24 September)
• additional aria native semantics (Wednesday, 23 September)
• (aria-*) role and other values (Wednesday, 23 September)
• aria and multiple roles (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: aria mappings (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Aria-* vs html attributes and reflection (Wednesday, 23 September)
• section/article grouping and CSS [was: Re: what is dt?] (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: aria mappings (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: itemheader names <h> (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: itemheader names <h> (Wednesday, 23 September)
• aria mappings (Wednesday, 23 September)
• itemheader names <h> (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Bug 7470 -- mention aria-* attributes in element definitions. (Tuesday, 22 September)
• <summary> [was: Re: what is dt?] (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Speakers in Dialogues; citations (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: aria-describedby vs longdesc [was: Re: Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support] (Wednesday, 16 September)
• aria-describedby vs longdesc [was: Re: Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support] (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: FW: [html] Summary draft (Tuesday, 15 September)
• what is dt? (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: guidance location? [was: Re: <details> ] (Monday, 14 September)
• guidance location? [was: Re: <details> ] (Monday, 14 September)
• aria-role vs role -- from SVG (Sunday, 13 September)
• Example of Good Summary??? (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: tweaking meter [was: Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5)] (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: tweaking meter [was: Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5)] (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: tweaking meter [was: Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5)] (Wednesday, 2 September)
• tweaking meter [was: Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5)] (Wednesday, 2 September)
• meter changes [was: Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5] (Wednesday, 2 September)
• aria vs native alternatives [was: Re: feedback requested on WAI CG Consensus Resolutions on Text alternatives in HTML 5 document] (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Costs and clear guidance [was: Recording teleconferences?] (Wednesday, 2 September)
• aria implicit roles exposed? (Wednesday, 2 September)
• not specifying UI [was: Re: Please Specify Behavior for @rel="next | prev"] (Tuesday, 1 September)
• needed updates: RE: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 (Tuesday, 1 September)

John Foliot

• RE: Pre-TPAC HTML5 Video Accessibility Workshop November 1 (Wednesday, 23 September)
• RE: Complexity of HTML5 (was Re: The Complexity Argument) (Sunday, 20 September)
• RE: Speakers in Dialogues (Was: what is dt?) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• RE: aria-describedby vs longdesc [was: Re: Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support] (Tuesday, 15 September)
• RE: Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support (Tuesday, 15 September)
• RE: [html] Summary draft (Tuesday, 15 September)
• RE: [html] Summary draft (Tuesday, 15 September)
• RE: FW: [html] Summary draft (Tuesday, 15 September)
• RE: ARIA's role="" attribute (was Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog>) (Thursday, 10 September)
• RE: The History of <aside> for sidebars (Friday, 4 September)
• RE: The History of <aside> for sidebars (Friday, 4 September)
• RE: The History of <aside> for sidebars (Friday, 4 September)

Jonas Sicking

• Re: ISSUE-41/ACTION-97 decentralized-extensibility (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [Bug 7727] legacy doc type does not need to be discouraged by "SHOULD NOT" (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: ACTION-137 on URI/IRI/URL (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: The Complexity Argument (was: Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD) (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML+RDFa as First Public Working Draft (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: HTML WG Testing Task Force (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: ARIA's role="" attribute (was Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog>) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: ARIA's role="" attribute (was Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog>) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: ARIA's role="" attribute (was Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog>) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: ARIA's role="" attribute (was Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog>) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: ARIA's role="" attribute (was Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog>) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Sunday, 6 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback (dialog and datepickers) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback (dialog and datepickers) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback (dialog and datepickers) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Tuesday, 1 September)

Joshue O Connor

• Re: Questions arising from ARIA/HTML5 integration (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: Questions arising from ARIA/HTML5 integration (Friday, 4 September)

Julian Reschke

• Re: [Bug 7727] legacy doc type does not need to be discouraged by "SHOULD NOT" (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Sunday, 27 September)
• ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Monday, 21 September)
• head/@profile, profile link relation, was: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: ISSUE-73 (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: 4.10.4.1.5 E-mail state (Tuesday, 8 September)
• 4.10.4.1.5 E-mail state (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 (Thursday, 3 September)

Karl Dubost

• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML+RDFa as First Public Working Draft (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> (Sunday, 13 September)
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> (Sunday, 13 September)
• Re: HTML WG Testing Task Force (Friday, 11 September)

Krzysztof Maczyński

• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: Serialization of PI misses ending question mark (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: Serialization of PI misses ending question mark (Saturday, 19 September)
• Serialization of PI misses ending question mark (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: ACTION-103 Follow up on the about: scheme Registration (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: ACTION-103 Follow up on the about: scheme Registration (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML+RDFa as First Public Working Draft (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: ACTION-103 Follow up on the about: scheme Registration (Friday, 18 September)
• Bindings instead of video, audio, canvas and img (Friday, 18 September)

Lachlan Hunt

• Re: ACTION-103 Follow up on the about: scheme Registration (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: ACTION-103 Follow up on the about: scheme Registration (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: ACTION-103 Follow up on the about: scheme Registration (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Friday, 18 September)
• ACTION-103 Follow up on the about: scheme Registration (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: aria-describedby vs longdesc [was: Re: Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support] (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: <details> (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: HTML WG Testing Task Force (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Monday, 7 September)
• Authoring Requirements for Using SVG and MathML in HTML Documents (Sunday, 6 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: The History of <aside> for sidebars (Friday, 4 September)
• The History of <aside> for sidebars (was: Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: Agenda for HTML WG telcon 2009-08-20 - Accessibility TF, HTML5 Test Suite, etc (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Tuesday, 1 September)

Larry Masinter

• RE: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Monday, 28 September)
• ACTION-137 on URI/IRI/URL (Thursday, 24 September)
• Protocol feature sets and specification clarity (Thursday, 24 September)
• draft agenda for IRI working group BOF, and draft charter for IRI (Wednesday, 23 September)
• proposed update to IRI document posted (Monday, 21 September)
• IDNA, IRI, HTML5 coordination (Wednesday, 16 September)

Lars Gunther

• Re: [html5] input type=time & min/max. (Sunday, 20 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Sunday, 20 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: Pedagogic validation (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: [Bug 7508] <dialog> needs a way to add non-speech related information (Thursday, 10 September)
• Pedagogic validation (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback (dialog and datepickers) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback (dialog and datepickers) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback (dialog and datepickers) (Wednesday, 2 September)

Laura Carlson

• Pre-TPAC HTML5 Video Accessibility Workshop November 1 (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: head/@profile, profile link relation, was: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: aria-describedby vs longdesc [was: Re: Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support] (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: FW: [html] Summary draft (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: Accessibility Task Force (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: Accessibility Task Force (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: Accessibility Task Force (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: Accessibility Task Force (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: Pedagogic validation (Wednesday, 9 September)

Leif Halvard Silli

• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: dt/dd in figure/details has killer rendering issues in ie6 and (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: dt/dd in figure/details has killer rendering issues in ie6 and (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: itemheader names <h> (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: dt/dd in figure/details has killer rendering issues in ie6 and (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: Complexity of HTML5 (was Re: The Complexity Argument) (Sunday, 20 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: dt/dd in figure/details has killer rendering issues in ie6 and ie7 (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: Serialization of PI misses ending question mark (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: dt/dd in figure/details has killer rendering issues in ie6 and ie7 (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: dt/dd in figure/details has killer rendering issues in ie6 and ie7 (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML+RDFa as First Public Working Draft (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: DIALOG Issues Which Have Already Been Submitted as Proposals (includes DL) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: The <who> element (Was: Change back the semantics of <cite>) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> (Wednesday, 16 September)
• The <who> element (Was: Change back the semantics of <cite>) (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog> (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog> (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog> (Thursday, 10 September)
• Change back the semantics of <cite> (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [Bug 7508] <dialog> needs a way to add non-speech related information (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: ARIA's role="" attribute (was Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog>) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog> (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: ARIA's role="" attribute (was Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog>) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [Bug 7508] <dialog> needs a way to add non-speech related information (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog> (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: ARIA's role="" attribute (was Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog>) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [Bug 7508] <dialog> needs a way to add non-speech related information (Wednesday, 9 September)
• <dialog> bugs (was: Implementor feedback (dialog and datepickers)) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback (dialog and datepickers) (Sunday, 6 September)
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers (Sunday, 6 September)
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers (Sunday, 6 September)
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: ISSUE-48: UA-q-quotes - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback (dialog and datepickers) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback (dialog and datepickers) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback (dialog and datepickers) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: up up up, was: Last Call: draft-nottingham-http-link-header (Web Linking) to Proposed Standard (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Rel="first" and "index" breaks specs and implementations (Tuesday, 1 September)

Lord Armitage

• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> (Friday, 11 September)

Maciej Stachowiak

• CfC: Create HTML Accessibility Task Force (Tuesday, 29 September)
• CfC: Create Testing Task Force (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: Cross posting madness must stop. (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: Cross posting madness must stop. (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: WebIDL (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: WebIDL (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: Moving HTML+RDFa draft issues to HTML WG bug tracker (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: WebIDL (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: ACTION-137 on URI/IRI/URL (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: How to track issues that block PR but not Last Call (was Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: ISSUE-13: handling-http-401-status - suggest closing on 2009-08-20 (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: CfC: declare WebSockets out of scope (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: aria mappings (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: aria mappings (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: HTML5 RDFa Test Suite (was Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: Complexity of HTML5 (was Re: The Complexity Argument) (Sunday, 20 September)
• Complexity of HTML5 (was Re: The Complexity Argument) (Sunday, 20 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: CfC: Publish HTML+RDFa as First Public Working Draft (Friday, 18 September)
• CfC: Publish HTML+RDFa as First Public Working Draft (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: Accessibility Task Force (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [html] Summary draft (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [html] Summary draft (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [html] Summary draft (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [html] Summary draft (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [html] Summary draft (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [html] Summary draft (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: [TAG post:] "HTML 5's proposed basis in DOM/JS skews web control and monetization..." (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: Accessibility Task Force (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: how many URL issues doe we need/want? Re: Agenda for HTML WG telcon 2009-09-10 - Accessibility TF, Testing TF, etc (Thursday, 10 September)
• CfC: declare WebSockets out of scope (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: <video> and <audio> (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Sunday, 6 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Sunday, 6 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: Questions arising from ARIA/HTML5 integration (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Friday, 4 September)
• Where people have discussions (was Re: The History of <aside> for sidebars) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: what is the spec telling authors about missing link/@rel? (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: ISSUE-48: UA-q-quotes - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: Agenda for HTML WG telcon 2009-08-20 - Accessibility TF, HTML5 Test Suite, etc (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: picking up on some comments in IRC on ARIA (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: closing issue-30 longdesc in favor of aria-describedby [was: Consolidated issues ...] (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: picking up on some comments in IRC on ARIA (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: Agenda for HTML WG telcon 2009-08-20 - Accessibility TF, HTML5 Test Suite, etc (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: aria implicit roles exposed? (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: Questions arising from ARIA/HTML5 integration (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers (Tuesday, 1 September)

Manu Sporny

• Integrated Philip Taylor's RDFa tests for XHTML, HTML4, HTML5 (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: Agenda for HTML WG telcon 2009-09-24 - CfCs, Accessibility TF, Testing TF, etc. (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) (Monday, 28 September)
• ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) (Monday, 28 September)
• Moving HTML+RDFa draft issues to HTML WG bug tracker (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: HTML5 RDFa Test Suite (was Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• [Fwd: Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD] (Tuesday, 22 September)
• HTML5 RDFa Test Suite (was Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: The Complexity Argument (Tuesday, 22 September)
• The Complexity Argument (was: Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: head/@profile, profile link relation, was: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Friday, 18 September)
• Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 16 September)
• HTML+RDFa (2nd draft) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Tuesday, 1 September)

Mark Baker

• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 (Tuesday, 1 September)

Mark Birbeck

• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: ARIA's role="" attribute (was Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog>) (Sunday, 13 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Thursday, 3 September)

Mark S. Miller

• Re: Cross posting madness must stop. (Sunday, 27 September)
• Fwd: Cross posting madness must stop. (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Fwd: Web IDL Garden Hose (Sunday, 27 September)
• Cross posting madness must stop. (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Friday, 25 September)

Martin Kliehm

• Re: ISSUE-48: UA-q-quotes - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: ISSUE-48: UA-q-quotes - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 (Thursday, 3 September)

Martin McEvoy

• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> (Tuesday, 15 September)

Masataka Yakura

• Re: what is dt? (Wednesday, 16 September)

Michael A. Puls II

• Re: Serialization of PI misses ending question mark (Sunday, 20 September)
• Re: Serialization of PI misses ending question mark (Saturday, 19 September)

Michael Cooper

• Re: Accessibility Task Force (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: Accessibility Task Force (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: Accessibility Task Force (Thursday, 10 September)

Michael Hausenblas

• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Tuesday, 8 September)

nemo@m8y.org

• Clarification of application of same origin policy for data:/javascript: URIs in Web Workers requested (Thursday, 10 September)

Nick Fitzsimons

• Re: aria mappings (Thursday, 24 September)

Nikunj R. Mehta

• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Monday, 28 September)
• Resending Re: Application Cache review (Monday, 21 September)

Oliver Hunt

• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Saturday, 26 September)

Olivier GENDRIN

• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog> (Thursday, 10 September)

Patrick H. Lauke

• Re: Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support (Tuesday, 15 September)

Paul Cotton

• RE: Create HTML Accessibility Task Force (Wednesday, 30 September)
• RE: Agenda for HTML WG telcon 2009-09-24 - CfCs, Accessibility TF, Testing TF, etc. (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Call for volunteers: Testing task force facilitator (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Call for volunteers: Accessiblity task force facilitator (Wednesday, 30 September)
• FW: Agenda for HTML WG telcon 2009-09-24 - CfCs, Accessibility TF, Testing TF, etc. (Tuesday, 22 September)
• RE: Accessibility Task Force (Tuesday, 22 September)
• ACTION-127: establish process for "official WG response" to other WG's RFC on LC drafts (Thursday, 17 September)
• RE: HTML WG Testing Task Force (Thursday, 17 September)
• FW: Agenda for HTML WG telcon 2009-09-10 - Accessibility TF, Testing TF, etc (Wednesday, 9 September)
• HTML WG Testing Task Force (Wednesday, 9 September)
• RE: Accessibility Task Force (Wednesday, 9 September)

Peter Saint-Andre

• Re: Protocol feature sets and specification clarity (Thursday, 24 September)

Philip Jägenstedt

• Re: video size when aspect ratio is not 1 (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: video size when aspect ratio is not 1 (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: video size when aspect ratio is not 1 (Thursday, 3 September)

Philip Taylor

• Re: ISSUE-41/ACTION-97 decentralized-extensibility (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: HTML5 RDFa Test Suite (was Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: On testing HTML (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: XMLLiterals and c14n (Monday, 7 September)
• XMLLiterals and c14n (was: HTML+RDFa (2nd draft)) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Thursday, 3 September)

Philippe Le Hegaret

• On testing HTML (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: Accessibility Task Force (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: Accessibility Task Force (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: Accessibility Task Force (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: Accessibility Task Force (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: Accessibility Task Force (Thursday, 10 September)

Richard Schwerdtfeger

• Re: aria-describedby vs longdesc [was: Re: Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support] (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: aria vs native alternatives [was: Re: feedback requested on WAI CG Consensus Resolutions on Text alternatives in HTML 5 document] (Thursday, 3 September)

Robert O'Callahan

• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: ISSUE-37 - html-svg-mathml - suggest closing on 2009-08-20 (Tuesday, 1 September)

Robin Berjon

• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Tuesday, 1 September)

Roy T. Fielding

• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Sunday, 27 September)

Sam Ruby

• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Thursday, 24 September)
• ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: What attributes are required on the <sytle> element? (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-09-17 (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: [html] Summary draft (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [TAG post:] "HTML 5's proposed basis in DOM/JS skews web control and monetization..." (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: Accessibility Task Force (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: Accessibility Task Force (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: Accessibility Task Force (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: Accessibility Task Force (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: Accessibility Task Force (Thursday, 10 September)
• ISSUE-73 (was: Agenda for HTML WG telcon 2009-09-10) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Sunday, 6 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: Where people have discussions (was Re: The History of <aside> for sidebars) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (Wednesday, 2 September)

Schnabel, Stefan

• RE: Example of Good Summary??? (Friday, 11 September)

Shane McCarron

• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Thursday, 3 September)

Shelley Powers

• Re: dt/dd in figure/details has killer rendering issues in ie6 and (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: dt/dd in figure/details has killer rendering issues in ie6 and ie7 (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: dt/dd in figure/details has killer rendering issues in ie6 and ie7 (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? use of summary in Figure (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? focusing on Figure (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Tuesday, 15 September)
• what is dt? (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Sunday, 6 September)
• More on SVG within HTML pages (Sunday, 6 September)

Silvia Pfeiffer

• Re: [TAG post:] "HTML 5's proposed basis in DOM/JS skews web control and monetization..." (Monday, 14 September)

Simon Pieters

• Re: what is dt? (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Removing <source> should make resource selection not fire 'error' on it (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: <details> (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: Pedagogic validation (Saturday, 12 September)
• Re: Pedagogic validation (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: noscript in HTML fragment serialization algorithm (Wednesday, 2 September)

Smylers

• Re: what is dt? (Sunday, 20 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Sunday, 20 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: Speakers in Dialogues (Was: what is dt?) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: Speakers in Dialogues (Was: what is dt?) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: <details> (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: Pedagogic validation (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: The <who> element (Was: Change back the semantics of <cite>) (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: Pedagogic validation (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: aria vs native alternatives [was: Re: feedback requested on WAI CG Consensus Resolutions on Text alternatives in HTML 5 document] (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: Questions arising from ARIA/HTML5 integration (Tuesday, 1 September)

Stephen Stewart

• Re: Speakers in Dialogues (Was: what is dt?) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [Bug 7508] <dialog> needs a way to add non-speech related information (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [Bug 7508] <dialog> needs a way to add non-speech related information (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback (dialog and datepickers) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Tuesday, 1 September)

Steven Faulkner

• Re: aria mappings (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: Drag and Drop API (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: aria-describedby vs longdesc [was: Re: Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support] (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: aria-role vs role -- from SVG (Sunday, 13 September)
• Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog> (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: Questions arising from ARIA/HTML5 integration (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: aria vs native alternatives [was: Re: feedback requested on WAI CG Consensus Resolutions on Text alternatives in HTML 5 document] (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: aria vs native alternatives [was: Re: feedback requested on WAI CG Consensus Resolutions on Text alternatives in HTML 5 document] (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: aria vs native alternatives [was: Re: feedback requested on WAI CG Consensus Resolutions on Text alternatives in HTML 5 document] (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: aria vs native alternatives [was: Re: feedback requested on WAI CG Consensus Resolutions on Text alternatives in HTML 5 document] (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: aria vs native alternatives [was: Re: feedback requested on WAI CG Consensus Resolutions on Text alternatives in HTML 5 document] (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: aria vs native alternatives [was: Re: feedback requested on WAI CG Consensus Resolutions on Text alternatives in HTML 5 document] (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: picking up on some comments in IRC on ARIA (Wednesday, 2 September)
• picking up on some comments in IRC on ARIA (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: aria implicit roles exposed? (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: Questions arising from ARIA/HTML5 integration (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: Questions arising from ARIA/HTML5 integration (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: Questions arising from ARIA/HTML5 integration (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: Questions arising from ARIA/HTML5 integration (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: Questions arising from ARIA/HTML5 integration (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: Questions arising from ARIA/HTML5 integration (Tuesday, 1 September)

Steven Rowat

• Re: Complexity of HTML5 (was Re: The Complexity Argument) (Monday, 21 September)
• [TAG post:] "Ten Use-Cases of Individual Content Authors Requiring Rights/Commerce Metadata..." (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: Complexity of HTML5 (was Re: The Complexity Argument) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: Complexity of HTML5 (was Re: The Complexity Argument) (Sunday, 20 September)
• Re: The Complexity Argument (was: Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD) (Sunday, 20 September)
• [TAG post:] "HTML 5's proposed basis in DOM/JS skews web control and monetization..." (Monday, 14 September)

T.V Raman

• Re: ARIA's role="" attribute (was Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog>) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: ARIA's role="" attribute (was Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog>) (Thursday, 10 September)
• RE: ARIA's role="" attribute (was Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog>) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: picking up on some comments in IRC on ARIA (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Tuesday, 1 September)

Tab Atkins Jr.

• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: section/article grouping and CSS [was: Re: what is dt?] (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: dt/dd in figure/details has killer rendering issues in ie6 and (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: itemheader names <h> (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: itemheader names <h> (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: dt/dd in figure/details has killer rendering issues in ie6 and ie7 (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: dt/dd in figure/details has killer rendering issues in ie6 and ie7 (Tuesday, 22 September)
• dt/dd in figure/details has killer rendering issues in ie6 and ie7 (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: The <who> element (Was: Change back the semantics of <cite>) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? use of summary in Figure (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: what is dt? (Thursday, 17 September)
• Example of Good Summary (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [Bug 7508] <dialog> needs a way to add non-speech related information (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: The History of <aside> for sidebars (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: The History of <aside> for sidebars (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: The History of <aside> for sidebars (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: The History of <aside> for sidebars (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback (dialog and datepickers) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: The History of <aside> for sidebars (was: Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: tweaking meter [was: Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5)] (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: tweaking meter [was: Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5)] (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: tweaking meter [was: Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5)] (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: HTML5 feedback from prominent designers (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Tuesday, 1 September)

Tantek Celik

• Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 (Tuesday, 1 September)

Thomas Broyer

• Re: 4.10.4.1.5 E-mail state (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: Pedagogic validation (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog> (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog> (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: 4.10.4.1.5 E-mail state (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) (Wednesday, 2 September)

Thomas Pike

• Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (Tuesday, 8 September)

Toby Inkster

• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: <details> (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: <details> (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: <details> (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: Change back the semantics of <cite> (Sunday, 13 September)
• Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog> (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: ARIA's role="" attribute (was Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog>) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [Bug 7508] <dialog> needs a way to add non-speech related information (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [Bug 7509] Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog> (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: tweaking meter [was: Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5)] (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: <meter> and <progress> (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: <keygen> element (was RE: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: up up up, was: Last Call: draft-nottingham-http-link-header (Web Linking) to Proposed Standard (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: up up up, was: Last Call: draft-nottingham-http-link-header (Web Linking) to Proposed Standard (Tuesday, 1 September)
• RE: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 (Tuesday, 1 September)

Yehuda Katz

• Re: WebIDL (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: WebIDL (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: WebIDL (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination) (Saturday, 26 September)
• WebIDL (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Thursday, 24 September)

~:'' ありがとうございました

• W3C process: was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination (Sunday, 27 September)

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 September 2009 23:31:00 UTC