Re: what is the spec telling authors about missing link/@rel?

>> I think it's defining the semantics of a nonconforming case.
> That makes no sense to me. Why tell authors semantics
> of nonconforming cases?
> i.e. that some documents are non-conforming but
> their semantics are of interest not just
> to tag-soup-consumers but to authors as well?

As an author, I'm interested in the semantics of documents that I write,
regardless of whether or not I manage to obey all of the conformance
criteria. So I think the spec is sensible in this case.


Received on Thursday, 3 September 2009 18:28:45 UTC