W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2009

Re: what is the spec telling authors about missing link/@rel?

From: Edward O'Connor <hober0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 11:27:41 -0700
Message-ID: <3b31caf90909031127i689fa2eald07c743686623b5e@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, public-html@w3.org
>> I think it's defining the semantics of a nonconforming case.
> That makes no sense to me. Why tell authors semantics
> of nonconforming cases?
> i.e. that some documents are non-conforming but
> their semantics are of interest not just
> to tag-soup-consumers but to authors as well?

As an author, I'm interested in the semantics of documents that I write,
regardless of whether or not I manage to obey all of the conformance
criteria. So I think the spec is sensible in this case.

Received on Thursday, 3 September 2009 18:28:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:51 UTC