W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2009

Re: Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)

From: Mark S. Miller <erights@google.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:43:30 -0700
Message-ID: <4d2fac900909261543k46ce61d4g3686de61e8bf4cfc@mail.gmail.com>
To: Allen Wirfs-Brock <Allen.Wirfs-Brock@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.com>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, es-discuss <es-discuss@mozilla.org>
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote:
> Indeed, much of the custom [[Get]] etc. functionality can be turned into
> ES5 meta-object stuff.  A pertinent question is then: should we change
> Web IDL to specify an ES5 binding (and not ES3) at this point, given
> that specs depending on it want to advance along the Rec track?

Since ES5 will be officially done well ahead of HTML5, I don't see why
not. But I do not know what your "Rec track" constraints imply.

Received on Saturday, 26 September 2009 22:44:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:51 UTC