- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:29:57 -0700
- To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
- Message-id: <D6AF1B7B-28C4-4763-BAC6-8DF643281A40@apple.com>
Hi Larry, Thanks for the update. And in particular, I'd like to thank you for hopping on to IRC to discuss the issues. Even though these discussions got a bit heated at times, I found them useful and I feel that we gained understanding of each other's perspectives. Regards, Maciej On Sep 24, 2009, at 7:31 AM, Larry Masinter wrote: > Updated in tracker, but thought I would send in email: > > 2009-09-24 13:25:32: I did create another draft which I posted > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Sep/0854.html > > However, this didn't address all HTML WG comments as promised, > although I'd made some good progress. The main "issue" (which led to > splitting this out in the first place) is to come up with a way of > resolving conflicts between IETF and W3C specs and what browsers > actually do (see section 12 of above document.) > > Subsequently (and after some discussions with Maciej and Hixie on > IRC chat and discussions at TAG meeting now ongoing), I expect to be > able to produce another document in the next few days. (Updating due > date to 9/28). > > In the meanwhile, I'm trying to schedule IETF work to get IETF > approval of this approach to URI/IRI/etc. An IETF working group may > be necessary to get other IETF working groups (IDNA, HTTP, mailto > URI) to pay attention. [Larry Masinter] > > -- > http://larry.masinter.net >
Received on Friday, 25 September 2009 01:30:39 UTC