- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 05:03:39 +0200
- To: Stephen Stewart <carisenda@gmail.com>
- CC: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@målform.no>, public-html@w3.org
Stephen Stewart On 09-09-09 16.05: > On 9 Sep 2009, at 14:37, Leif Halvard Silli wrote: >> Stephen added: >>> Some examples of chat on the web can be found at: >>> >>> http://projectcerbera.com/!dev/irc-logs/day I had a look at that page - was quite possible to represent that chat log as a <dl> list. [...] >>> Mibbit.com similarly uses a <table> but I think one example with >>> <table> is enough. >> >> Bug 7808 [1] is about making <dialog> work *properly* [...] > > Sorry, I got confused by the summary: "<dialog> needs a way to add non- > speech related information" and the current, not set in stone, status > of HTML5. Your examples demonstrates that authors needs to learn how to mark up dialogs with <dialog>/<dl> - in that way it was very related ... >> If you think that dialogs are better, more accessible and more >> simply marked up via other means, then that would be another bug >> report. I'll only say that I think it is fruitless to say that we >> should not have a <dialog> element if you at the same time also want >> to advice against using <dl> for dialog. Personally I think we could >> continue HTML 4's advice to use <dl> for dialogs, especially if we >> add an attribute which informs that it is a dialog - see bug 7509[2]. > > I do think that dialogues are more simply and better marked up by > other means, Such as? (The draft, although not perfect, tells us where to put the name and where to put the speech ... There is a recipe and it is simple.) > I also think that since most popular chat mark-up appears > not to be using <dl> as encouraged by HTML 4 we should at least > consider the alternatives, There has been a substream of people that have used <dl> always. (There would be more if it was simpler to style.) > or remove it altogether and use what we > have in <section> <h> and <p>. I lean toward the latter. Would you even use a <dl> for a glossary ... ? Why do you want to use h1-h6 elements? To get an outline/ToC with all the postings? Here is an almost real posting from a Norwegian online newspaper, with a subject line represented with a <h5>: <dt>Mr Waffel said, yesterday:</dt><dd> <h5>RE: Norway won't reach the soccer final</h5> <p>Yes, we will.</p> <aside><a>New comment</a> <a>Reply</a> <a>Report</a></aside> </dd> >> [1]http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7508 >> [2]http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=750 -- leif halvard silli
Received on Thursday, 10 September 2009 03:04:20 UTC