- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 01:15:22 +0200
- To: "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:06:04 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: > On Sep 10, 2009, at 8:47 AM, Dan Connolly wrote: >> On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 17:14 +0000, Paul Cotton wrote: >> [...] >>> 2. New issues this week >>> a) Topic ISSUE 78: Spec should use a term other than "URL" for Web >>> Addresses >>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/78 >> >> I suggest closing that as a dup of issue-56 >> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/56 > > I think it's somewhat useful to track the naming issue from the issue of > what to reference, since we could resolve those independently and at > separate times. For this part of the specification it is actually somewhat annoying that it has been splitted out. The alternate iri-bis draft that is available does not match what used to be in the draft (in a bad way) and updates are slow. I resorted to using http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-html5-20090423/infrastructure.html#urls but I doubt no fixes have been made since then. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 10 September 2009 23:16:12 UTC