- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 08:50:22 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Julian Reschke wrote: > Ian Hickson wrote: > > ... > > > > what features are lacking these requirements? > > > I will look for more, but for now, let's just get those two attributes > > > defined. > > > > Which two attributes? I'm not aware of anything that's lacking suitable > > conformance criteria. Since I fixed <head profile> and <meta scheme>, I've > > not heard anyone list for any other features that need work. > > Are you referring to: > > "User agents should ignore the profile content attribute on head elements. > > When the attribute would be used as a globally unique name, the user agent > should instead always assume that all known profiles apply to all pages, and > should therefore apply the conventions of all known metadata profiles to the > document. > > When the attribute's value would be handled as a URL and dereferenced, the > user agent may resolve the attribute's value, and if that is successful, may > then fetch the resulting absolute URL and apply the appropriate processing. > > The profile IDL attribute of the head element must reflect the content > attribute of the same name." > > ? > > That's not a definition of what head/@profile is. Sorry. It is. Sorry. (Could you be more specific? What processing is this missing?) > And it's incorrect in that it talks about a single URI, not a set of > URIs. HTML4 defined it as taking a single URI. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 3 September 2009 08:47:55 UTC