Re: <keygen> element

On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Adrian Bateman <> wrote:
> On Monday, September 07, 2009 5:26 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
>> It seems to me that the least damaging solution to avoiding requiring
>> things that a vendor has vetoed would be keeping <keygen> conforming and
>> in the HTML5 spec but making implementing it optional in the sense that
>> it must parse the same way in all UAs but whether it on layers above the
>> parser acts as HTMLKeygenElement or as HTMLUnknownElement is up to the
>> implementation.
> I'm not sure being in the spec or defined elsewhere affects this since all
> unknown elements should parse in the same way in a conforming UA.

Except I think <keygen> parses different from unknown elements since
it's a void element.

/ Jonas

Received on Wednesday, 9 September 2009 17:30:44 UTC