Re: guidance location? [was: Re: <details> ]

On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Anne van Kesteren <> wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:09:05 +0200, Jim Jewett <>
> wrote:

[why not add @implements]

>> His response is probably too detailed for inclusion in the
>> specification itself, but I would hate to see that information lost. ...

> There is a FAQ on the WHATWG Wiki that also addresses new features:
> You could add it there I suppose or start a new page specifically for this.

Done; whether it is in the right location is another issue, and I
won't take offense if someone moves or rewrites it.  I would be
grateful if someone starts adding similar pages for other issues.


Received on Monday, 14 September 2009 19:00:08 UTC