- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:00:01 +0300
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: "Robin Berjon" <robin@berjon.com>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Sep 1, 2009, at 14:48, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 13:33:29 +0200, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> > wrote: >> On Sep 1, 2009, at 14:19, Robin Berjon wrote: >>> Could adding an itemvaluetype attribute help (we can pick a better >>> name later)? itemvaluetype = textContent | childNodes | ... >>> defaulting to the former? >> >> How would you map the latter to JSON? > > Having information loss seems like the easiest solution. It's not > that relevant that it works in JSON. Bringing in the whole complexity of DOM subtrees to microdata makes in significantly less micro (consider XMLLiteral). I'd rather keep microdata simple and address lack of native markup features without microdata. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Tuesday, 1 September 2009 12:00:46 UTC