- From: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:21:20 -0400
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Jim Jewett <jimjjewett@gmail.com>, HTML WG Public List <public-html@w3.org>
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Jim Jewett <jimjjewett@gmail.com> wrote: >> But as long as we're thinking generic instead of figure-specific, >> maybe the answer is a simple <h>. Because of h1-h6, the meaning >> should be more obvious than it is with most short tags; because of the >> rejection of <h> to replace h1-h6, it is still available. > > I am absolutely certain that you will see <h> rampantly misused to replace <h*>. That was one of my first thoughts too. It sounds like a really bad idea to use it to mean anything other than <h[1-6]>, since that's what I'd assume it means. Especially given the "use h1 everywhere" idea that HTML5 promotes.
Received on Tuesday, 22 September 2009 22:22:01 UTC