Re: itemheader names <h>

On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Jim Jewett <> wrote:
>> But as long as we're thinking generic instead of figure-specific,
>> maybe the answer is a simple <h>.  Because of h1-h6, the meaning
>> should be more obvious than it is with most short tags; because of the
>> rejection of <h> to replace h1-h6, it is still available.
> I am absolutely certain that you will see <h> rampantly misused to replace <h*>.

That was one of my first thoughts too.  It sounds like a really bad
idea to use it to mean anything other than <h[1-6]>, since that's what
I'd assume it means.  Especially given the "use h1 everywhere" idea
that HTML5 promotes.

Received on Tuesday, 22 September 2009 22:22:01 UTC