- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:16:07 -0500
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Cc: Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Smylers@stripey.com, public-html@w3.org
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> wrote: > Tab Atkins Jr. On 09-09-17 19.59: >> As an author, using <dt>/<dd> for <details> seems fine. The letters >> match up, which is important from a mnemonic pov, and the basic idea >> works as well. <dt> in <dl> is "description title" to me, while <dd> >> is "description data". In <details>, they're instead "details title" >> and "details data". > > > So, perhaps <figure> could be renamed to something beginning on <d...> ? ;-) It would certainly make things seem less retarded. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 17 September 2009 18:17:12 UTC