- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 11:12:45 +0200
- To: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Hi, (see also <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/81> and <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7687>) This issue is about the question vs "resource" is the thing identified by a URI/URL, or the bag of bits you get when fetching it (for HTTP, for instance, using GET). Obviously, it can't be both for several reasons. The most obvious one that many resources [sic] are content-negotiated, so the bag of bits that a UA can fetch will depend on more than the request URI (such as request headers, point of time, or IP address). On the other hand, Ian writes: > RFC2616 is the one unnecessarily introducing new terminology here. A resource > is a bag of bits, and HTML5 consistently uses that term throughout. (<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7687#c1>) That is incorrect in itself, as there are parts of HTML5 which *do* use the traditional definition: "A URL is a string used to identify a resource." -- HTML5, Section 2.5.1, <http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#terminology-0> (the fragid may be instable...) Best regards, Julian
Received on Sunday, 27 September 2009 09:13:25 UTC