On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> wrote: > On Sep 27, 2009, at 00:36 , Cameron McCormack wrote: > >> Indeed, much of the custom [[Get]] etc. functionality can be turned into >> ES5 meta-object stuff. A pertinent question is then: should we change >> Web IDL to specify an ES5 binding (and not ES3) at this point, given >> that specs depending on it want to advance along the Rec track? >> > > I would tend to be rather in disfavour of anything that might cause WebIDL > to be delayed in any way. I also think that keeping the ES3 binding is > useful (in the short term at least) if only because it is familiar, This seems like a standard without an audience, as ES5 is becoming official well ahead of HTML5. Who needs HTML5 on ES3? > which might point to building the ES5 one separately. > > If at all possible I'd rather it went to LC ASAP, and if needed that new > stuff be done in a branched document. > > -- > Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > -- Cheers, --MarkM
Received on Sunday, 27 September 2009 19:45:27 UTC