On Sep 17, 2009, at 11:16 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Leif Halvard Silli
> <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> wrote:
>> Tab Atkins Jr. On 09-09-17 19.59:
>>> As an author, using <dt>/<dd> for <details> seems fine. The letters
>>> match up, which is important from a mnemonic pov, and the basic idea
>>> works as well. <dt> in <dl> is "description title" to me, while
>>> <dd>
>>> is "description data". In <details>, they're instead "details
>>> title"
>>> and "details data".
>>
>>
>> So, perhaps <figure> could be renamed to something beginning on
>> <d...> ? ;-)
>
> It would certainly make things seem less retarded.
I jokingly suggested <diagram> instead of <figure>, but I don't think
that would be an actual improvement.
- Maciej