- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:16:04 +0200
- To: "Jim Jewett" <jimjjewett@gmail.com>
- Cc: "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:09:05 +0200, Jim Jewett <jimjjewett@gmail.com> wrote: > Toby Inkster wrote a fairly convincing justification for script > @implements. > > Then, in > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Sep/0540.html , > Simon Pieters explained why it probably isn't the right approach in > general and suggested a better alternative for this specific case. > > His response is probably too detailed for inclusion in the > specification itself, but I would hate to see that information lost. > Is there an "annotated" version, or a collection of rationales, or > even a variant of a FAQ list where this should be collected? There is a FAQ on the WHATWG Wiki that also addresses new features: http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FAQ You could add it there I suppose or start a new page specifically for this. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 14 September 2009 16:16:49 UTC