- From: Lars Gunther <gunther@keryx.se>
- Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:10:38 +0200
- To: public-html@w3.org
2009-09-17 13:25, Bruce Lawson skrev: > Seems to me that's what it is already; spec says > > ... "Within a single dl element, there should not be more than one > dt element for each name." > Yes. WITHIN a dl. If we put dt/dd in figure and details, I predict we soon will have the outside of these as well. I also predict a lot of dt's without a matching dd, in figure and detail, since it seems redundant in those places. > I'd support rubric, but Hixie's adamant that a new element not be baked. I for one am still hoping that Ian listens as long as arguments are being made. I see "rather not" kind of language from him and not "I have made my mind up and it won't be changed until hell freezes over" on this issue. I think dl/dt is in the spec right now as it is the least bad option. I think we should strive for an option that is better than that. -- Lars Gunther http://keryx.se/ http://twitter.com/itpastorn/ http://itpastorn.blogspot.com/
Received on Thursday, 17 September 2009 12:11:17 UTC