- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 06:42:46 +0100
- To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 18:26 -0700, Larry Masinter wrote: > In addition, [XHTML1] > defines a profile of use of XHTML which is compatible with HTML > 4.01 and which may also be labeled as text/html. To be spectacularly picky, both RFC 2854 and XHTML 1.0 talk about a profile of *XHTML* which can be labelled as text/html. They don't talk about a profile of *XHTML 1.0*. There is nothing in either that *explicitly* states that Appendix C guidelines cannot be applied to other versions of XHTML. Neither does XHTML 1.1 contradict this anywhere. The XHTML Media Types note <http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-media-types> has explicit guidelines for serving any XHTML-family markup language as text/html, though of course, this is only a note. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Tuesday, 1 September 2009 05:43:32 UTC