- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:02:33 -0700
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Cc: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com> wrote: > On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:50:36 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Laura Carlson >> <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Aryeh >>> >>> You wrote [1]: >>> >>>> as far as I >>>> know, longdesc is so consistently misused that no user agent, AT or >>>> otherwise, bothers providing it to users in any obvious way by >>>> default. >>> >>> Opera 10.10 recently added longdesc support >>> http://www.iheni.com/londesc-support-opera-1010/ >> >> Meanwhile, Firefox 3.6 is removing support for it [1]. I added support >> for it a long time ago in [2], in fact, it was one of my first patches >> as a Mozilla contributor. However it was deemed too much code >> (literally thousands of lines of code) for too little gain. In these >> cases we generally advice the use of an extension instead, which seems >> like it's going to happen here [3]. > > This illustrates a few important things. For us it wasn't thousands of lines > of code, but a quick fix (and one we expect to mostly re-use for > aria-describedBy, as well as giving us experience of using that in the > browser itself). So clearly extrapolating from teh experience of either > Firefox or Opera doesn't apply to other people's code. I should note that the firefox code removed did a lot more than support @longdesc. It would definitely take a lot less code to *just* support @longdesc. / Jonas
Received on Tuesday, 15 September 2009 19:03:33 UTC