Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > In addition, it's likely we would informally expect the Task Force to > be accountable to both Working Groups and to have a mission to improve > cross-WG communication. > > Would this address the concerns? My concern is that informally expecting the task force to be accountable to both working groups is different than formally expecting it to be so. The formalism is an additional Process resource we can use if the need comes up. If we're successful we'll never need that, but I think we should have it there. This history of this task force is that it started as an informal sub-group of the PFWG. We realized that we needed to make sure that HTML people could be involved in the discussion and that we could be sure it would be public. That's the reason we proposed a joint task force. Having the task force shift completely over to the other working group does not meet the need that PF had in originally constituting it. I believe ever more strongly - though I am not representing PF in saying this - that it is very important that this task force be joint. Michael -- Michael Cooper Web Accessibility Specialist World Wide Web Consortium, Web Accessibility Initiative E-mail cooper@w3.org <mailto:cooper@w3.org> Information Page <http://www.w3.org/People/cooper/>
Received on Thursday, 10 September 2009 18:57:43 UTC