- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:14:57 +0100
- To: Philip Taylor <pjt47@cam.ac.uk>
- Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 13:58 +0100, Philip Taylor wrote: > (I think restricting href is still > worthwhile, to prevent future confusion for HTML authors who don't > care about RDFa at all and expect href to make links and should get > validator errors when it doesn't.) As do I - in terms of the triples generated, @href and @src can always be directly replaced with @resource and @about, so there is no reason to permit them on any element that HTML5 does not already permit them on. I don't see why the XHTML+RDFa 1.0 DTD permits them - I imagine it must have been an XHTML2 influence. RDFa processors should still allow those non-conforming uses to generate triples as per usual, but validators should report errors when they're seen. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Wednesday, 23 September 2009 15:15:52 UTC