Re: CfC: Publish HTML+RDFa as First Public Working Draft

I support publishing it as FPWD.

The concern that authoring a documet with these features in a wrong way won't produce clear feedback at once (here's to draconianism again! ;-)) cannot be directly alleviated, I'm afraid, because of the very nature of this technology's purpose. So we'll have to bypass it if we believe RDFa is worth having (and it's supposed to be, as a Rec).

Best regards,

Krzysztof

Received on Friday, 18 September 2009 21:30:45 UTC