Re: 4.10.4.1.5 E-mail state

On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, Thomas Broyer wrote:
> 
> Anyway, even if we don't change the current production; the draft can 
> just reference RFC 5321 instead of RFC1034+RFC5322, as it defines both 
> atext and ldh-str.

Yeah, I was going to do that when I looked at it earlier, but I had so 
much trouble actually finding anything in 5321 that I decided to not 
bother.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Monday, 14 September 2009 22:10:03 UTC