Re: E-mail state

On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, Thomas Broyer wrote:
> Anyway, even if we don't change the current production; the draft can 
> just reference RFC 5321 instead of RFC1034+RFC5322, as it defines both 
> atext and ldh-str.

Yeah, I was going to do that when I looked at it earlier, but I had so 
much trouble actually finding anything in 5321 that I decided to not 

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Monday, 14 September 2009 22:10:03 UTC