W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2009

Re: ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1)

From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:45:48 +0300
Cc: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>, Philip Taylor <pjt47@cam.ac.uk>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-Id: <5F4D1197-2526-47D7-AF4A-18D65F9691C9@iki.fi>
To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
On Sep 29, 2009, at 15:43, Toby Inkster wrote:

> On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 10:37 +0300, Henri Sivonen wrote:
>> On Sep 29, 2009, at 04:47, Mark Birbeck wrote:
>>> My recollection of the TF's discussion around @version is that it  
>>> was
>>> a way to allow RDFa consumers to decide whether they wanted to  
>>> parse a
>>> page or not.
>> It seems that you failed to allow it. A quick search through http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/
>>  for the string "version" suggests that http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/
>>  doesn't define any processing for @version. Therefore, there's
>> nothing in the RDFa in XHTML spec that allows an RDFa processor to
>> halt processing depending on @version and fail to extract the triples
>> encoded in the document.
> But there's also nothing in the syntax document that requires it to
> *start* processing. So an RDFa processor can simply opt to not begin
> processing, depending on whatever factors it wants.

It seems like a spec bug if main() { exit 0; } is a conforming RDFa  

Henri Sivonen
Received on Tuesday, 29 September 2009 12:46:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:52 UTC