Re: ISSUE-37 - html-svg-mathml - suggest closing on 2009-08-20

On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <> wrote:

> For WebKit we're not interested in full 1.2T support, and we're quite
> definitely not interested in XML Events, textArea, or the uDOM (especially
> Traits). Likely not xml:id either.


> From time to time, some of the other extensions have been proposed, but I
> do not recall the details.
> I could imagine svg:video and svg:audio being reasonable additions. I don't
> think they are as useful as the HTML versions, but most of the below-the-DOM
> implementation can be shared, so the cost is low. I don't feel strongly
> about this though.

Yeah, I think we could go either way too.

> I agree it would make sense to coordinate on 1.2T features to add. And
> since the SVG WG has changed in membership and focus since 1.2T was
> published, we should help future revisions of SVG to be better aligned with
> the rest of the Web platform.

Perhaps the best way to proceed is for people to propose 1.2T features that
they think *should* be on the Web.

"He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are
healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his
own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah

Received on Tuesday, 1 September 2009 03:55:24 UTC