- From: Jeremy Keith <jeremy@adactio.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:42:40 +0100
- To: Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Smylers@stripey.com, public-html@w3.org
Shelley wrote: > Yes, I think that, among our other concerns, we can also include a > concern about the mnemonics of dt/dd in Figure. I agree that it feels counterintuitive to use <dt>/<dd> inside <figure> but, IMHO, it does make sense inside <details> simply because the word "details" begins with a letter D — just as dt/dd made sense inside <dialog> when that element existed. So if we're going to discuss either: a) finding a better element to recycle for captioning <figure>s or b) creating a new element for captioning <figure>s, I think it would be good to keep <details> out of the discussion. -- Jeremy Keith a d a c t i o http://adactio.com/
Received on Thursday, 17 September 2009 08:43:23 UTC