- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:49:55 +0200
- To: "Toby Inkster" <tai@g5n.co.uk>, "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: "Jeremy Keith" <jeremy@adactio.com>, "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:12:51 +0200, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk> wrote:
> This would be a reason to add <script implements> to HTML5. The HTML5
> documentation would define a URI that represents the functionality of
> the <details> element, say:
There's a more robust way supported already:
if (typeof document.createElement('details').open == 'undefined') {
// script that implements <details> here
}
<script implements> seems to be equivalent to hasFeature in its design,
which is known to be unreliable (see the note about hasFeature in HTML5).
--
Simon Pieters
Opera Software
Received on Monday, 14 September 2009 13:50:59 UTC