- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:40:03 -0700
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Aug 24, 2009, at 7:35 AM, Dan Connolly wrote: > On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 21:14 -0700, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > [...] >> I'd like to ask the Chairs and Team Contacts for a their input on how >> to track issues that should not block Last Call, but should block PR. >> The need for such a status has become clear not only with this issue, >> but also with the issue of "about" registration. >> >> Dan Connolly proposed that issues marked as "Pending Review" can be >> treated as blocking PR but not LC. I don't think that works, given >> our >> current definition of Pending Review, which is that consensus has not >> yet been assessed (which might well indicate the issue blocks Last >> Call). >> >> My proposal, create a new product in the tracker, "HTML5 spec PR". >> Issues that block PR but not Last Call would be moved to this new >> product. > > That works for me. I created a component named "HTML5 spec - PR blockers" and moved ISSUE-53 there. Regards, Maciej
Received on Thursday, 24 September 2009 06:40:51 UTC