- From: Bruce Lawson <brucel@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:58:40 +0100
- To: "Jeremy Keith" <jeremy@adactio.com>, "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: "Shelley Powers" <shelleyp@burningbird.net>, Smylers@stripey.com, public-html@w3.org
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:49:24 +0100, Jeremy Keith <jeremy@adactio.com> wrote: > Maciej wrote: >>> So if we're going to discuss either: >>> a) finding a better element to recycle for captioning <figure>s or >>> b) creating a new element for captioning <figure>s, >> >> Do you have any ideas for other elements to recycle? > > Actually, I'm okay with <dt>. It's not perfect but hey, rough consensus > and running code. I think <dt> and <dd> are minging. But I agree with Jeremy; the aesthetics aren't important. In their huge favour: we don't bake a new element, they work so I can use details this decade (I care less about figure personally). I also believe that dd/ dt have such a history of being abused that no-one thinks they mean anything any way. -- Hang loose and stay groovy, Bruce Lawson Web Evangelist www.opera.com (work) www.brucelawson.co.uk (personal) www.twitter.com/brucel
Received on Thursday, 17 September 2009 10:00:05 UTC