- From: T.V Raman <raman@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 16:20:42 -0700
- To: tantek@cs.stanford.edu
- Cc: brucel@opera.com, mjs@apple.com, annevk@opera.com, jonas@sicking.cc, public-html@w3.org
And for the record, The Forms WG built all of XForms UI styling on top of CSS 3UI. A good place to look for implementation experience might be in the various browser extensions that implement XForms. --Raman Re: spec on form control styling: TC> TC> http://w3.org/TR/css3-ui TC> TC> Re: not as fast-moving TC> TC> Without officially speaking for CSS WG, I believe we (CSS WG) are waiting on implementations, though test-suite contributions are also encouraged. TC> TC> Maciej, how much of CSS3UI does WebKit implement? TC> TC> Bruce, how much of CSS3UI does Opera implement? TC> TC> ...., how much of CSS3UI does Mozilla implement? TC> TC> Tantek TC> Editor, CSS3UI TC> TC> -----Original Message----- TC> From: "Bruce Lawson" <brucel@opera.com> TC> TC> Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 10:44:04 TC> To: Maciej Stachowiak<mjs@apple.com>; Anne van Kesteren<annevk@opera.com> TC> Cc: Jonas Sicking<jonas@sicking.cc>; HTML WG<public-html@w3.org> TC> Subject: Re: Implementor feedback on new elements in HTML5 TC> TC> TC> On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 10:13:55 +0100, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> TC> wrote: TC> TC> TC> > Perhaps it's time to start a spec on form control styling. In WebKit, TC> > we've found that CSS styling plus control-specific pseudo-elements can TC> > go a long way. Would such a spec more appropriately be an HTML WG TC> > product or a CSS WG product? TC> TC> It's probably most appropriately a CSS WG, but they're not as fast-moving TC> as the HTML WG so maybe starting on it here would be helpful? TC> TC> bruce TC> -- Best Regards, --raman Title: Research Scientist Email: raman@google.com WWW: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/ Google: tv+raman GTalk: raman@google.com, tv.raman.tv@gmail.com PGP: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc
Received on Tuesday, 1 September 2009 23:21:46 UTC