- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 07:22:22 -0400
- To: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, public-html@w3.org
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3:22 AM, James Graham<jgraham@opera.com> wrote: > Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> >> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Jonas Sicking<jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Tab Atkins Jr.<jackalmage@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> So, I'm now fine with <aside> being used in that way. However, the >>>> current spec text is entirely inadequate, as it requires one to make >>>> that generalization step, which is often a *bad* move (it's precisely >>>> the sort of thing you'll do when you start, and get trained out of >>>> when you learn a bit more). I propose adding a third example >>>> explicitly illustrating that this is okay, like the following: >>> >>> Unfortunately very few people read the spec. So if something is hard >>> to understand adding text to the spec is unlikely to help. >> >> In this case we're okay, since it's only by reading the spec that I >> came to the wrong conclusion. ^_^ I, and many other people, >> immediately assume that <aside> *is* appropriate for sidebars when we >> see its name. I just want to make sure that reading the spec doesn't >> disabuse anyone of that correct notion, like it obviously has. > > Hmm, possibly I'm weird because there is no way that I get from the term > "aside" to "sidebar". I would really be interested to know how you make that > connection because (apart from the obvious fact that "side" is a substring > of both words) I honestly don't see it. Indeed I assumed for a long time > that <aisde> mean "pullout" rather than "sidebar" even though I must have > been involved with discussions where it was mentioned that it could be used > for a sidebar. I feel the same way. Not sure if this is because of the fact that English isn't my first language or not. (Though I suspect most web authors doesn't have english as first language). I always thought of <aside> as being used for footnotes and floating "infoboxes". > I am still unconvinced the semantic or UA-behaviour overlap between the two > cases (sidebar vs pullout) is great enough that a single element for both > makes sense. Agreed. One thing that I'm wondering is if sidebars aren't really <header>s, from a semantic point of view. Looking at wikipedia for example, it seems like the sidebar is basically just a <header> laid out to the side. / Jonas
Received on Friday, 4 September 2009 11:23:27 UTC