Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD

On Sep 22, 2009, at 12:38, Mark Birbeck wrote:

> Design principles are hardly "principles" if they can be changed on a
> whim. What you are now saying is 'pave the cowpaths that lots of cows
> in the grand scheme of things have been using'.
> But the cowpath metaphor is supposed to invoke the idea of something
> that people are already doing. There can be little ambiguity there --
> people are either already doing something, or they aren't. You either
> have a cowpath or you don't -- not one that suits your goals.

A few cows don't yet make a path. In any case, as Leif pointed out,  
the design principle says "consider adopting". RDFa was considered and  
rejected due to design problems.

> The BBC is publishing RDFa in the form of program reviews.
> UK government websites are publishing job vacancies and  
> consultations with RDFa.

Who consumes this data? (My point being: If a cow falls in the forest  
but no one is there to observe it, does it make a path?)

> Google is recommending the use of RDFa to add license information to
> images and videos.

I think this should be considered in the context of

Paving this path seems to call for a processing model that ignores  

> Drupal 7 includes RDFa support.

What does that mean? Does Drupal output RDFa? If so, who consumes it?  
Does it ingest RDFa? If so, from where?

Henri Sivonen

Received on Tuesday, 22 September 2009 11:51:46 UTC