W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2009

Re: what is the spec telling authors about missing link/@rel?

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 20:26:59 +0200
To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>
Cc: public-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.uzo1i50h64w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook.local>
On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 20:21:38 +0200, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote:
> That makes no sense to me. Why tell authors semantics
> of nonconforming cases?

The part that starts with "If the rel attribute is absent," is just a  
statement of fact, to clarify that case in case it was unclear. However,  
apparently that did not help you.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Thursday, 3 September 2009 18:27:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:51 UTC