- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 10:37:10 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Krzysztof Maczyński <1981km@gmail.com>
- Cc: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, public-html@w3.org
Received on Saturday, 19 September 2009 10:31:24 UTC
On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Krzysztof Maczy�~Dski wrote: > > Could we then have an empty document be valid HTML? We don't want quirks-mode documents to be valid. about:blank is in quirks mode. So I think it follows that about:blank has to be invalid. > I really think defining a URI to resolve to something invalid and not > deprecating it would be inconsistent and can be avoided here without > much difficulty. It's not clear to me why this matters, other than spec purity, which our design principles say comes last in terms of priorities. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 19 September 2009 10:31:24 UTC