W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2009

Re: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:01:20 -0700
Cc: Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.com>, public-webapps@w3.org, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, es-discuss <es-discuss@mozilla.org>
Message-id: <89CB9A63-803C-4952-A039-89F4C3AC5849@apple.com>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>

On Sep 24, 2009, at 2:37 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:

> Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>> On Sep 24, 2009, at 2:16 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>> On Sep 24, 2009, at 11:53 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>>>> Any TC39 members whose employers can't join could perhaps become  
>>>> Invited
>>>> Experts to the W3C Web Applications Working Group, if that  
>>>> facilitates
>>>> review.
>>> Unfortunately, no.  See #2 and #3 below:
>>> http://www.w3.org/2004/08/invexp.html
>> It depends on the nature of the employer, and the reason they are  
>> unable to join. Historically there have been Invited Experts in W3C  
>> Working Groups who are employed by such organizations as  
>> universities or small start-ups. We even have some in the HTML  
>> Working Group. So it would probably be more accurate to say "it  
>> depends" and that it may be subject to the judgment of the W3C Team.
> I've discussed the specific case with the W3C, and it is the case  
> that in the judgment of the W3C Team, the answer in this specific  
> case is no.
> You, of course, are welcome to try again in the hopes of getting a  
> different answer.

I didn't know that there was a specific case driving this concern. I  
thought this was a general worry about, e.g., university researchers.  
I would not ask the W3C Team to reconsider specific cases where they  
have already rendered a judgment.

Received on Thursday, 24 September 2009 22:02:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:51 UTC