Re: itemheader names <h>

On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Jim Jewett <> wrote:
> But as long as we're thinking generic instead of figure-specific,
> maybe the answer is a simple <h>.  Because of h1-h6, the meaning
> should be more obvious than it is with most short tags; because of the
> rejection of <h> to replace h1-h6, it is still available.

I am absolutely certain that you will see <h> rampantly misused to replace <h*>.


Received on Tuesday, 22 September 2009 22:18:55 UTC