w3c-wai-ig@w3.org from January to March 2000 by author

1hotinvestment@4-charity.org

• stock info dvdt (Wednesday, 5 January)

1hotstock@4-charity.org

• dvdt stock info (Wednesday, 5 January)

ADAM GUASCH-MELENDEZ

• Re: Questions about WCAG 6.3 (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: What's the scoop on Lynx for DOS (Friday, 3 March)
• Re: RE: Testing Setup for Accessible Web Sites/Applications (Wednesday, 5 January)

Al Gilman

• Re: FW: XML, Tables and Accessibility (Saturday, 18 March)
• Re: FW: XML, Tables and Accessibility (Saturday, 18 March)
• Re: the WAVE accessibility evaluator (INPUT type=image) (Friday, 17 March)
• Re: the WAVE accessibility evaluator (Friday, 17 March)
• Re: U.S. won't release new Web site regs for review (Friday, 25 February)
• Re: I am almost afraid to ask! (Friday, 18 February)
• Re: Testing Setup for Accessible Web Sites/Applications (Tuesday, 4 January)

Alan Cantor

• RE: What's the scoop on Lynx for DOS (Sunday, 5 March)
• What's the scoop on Lynx for DOS (Friday, 3 March)
• RE: Statements are now up (Wednesday, 9 February)

Alan J. Flavell

• RE: New York Times web site (Friday, 11 February)
• Re: screen readers, browsers, & the reporting of ALT on & in image maps (Thursday, 13 January)
• Re: screen readers, browsers, & the reporting of ALT on & in image maps (Wednesday, 12 January)

Andy Wilkinson

• RE: www accessibility: BETT website drops 'alt tags' (Monday, 17 January)

Ann Navarro

• Re: ABBR vs. ACRONYM (Sunday, 20 February)
• RE: About ABBR (Saturday, 19 February)
• RE: About ABBR (Saturday, 19 February)
• RE: About ABBR (Saturday, 19 February)
• RE: About ABBR (Friday, 18 February)
• Re: About ABBR (Friday, 18 February)
• Re: About ABBR (Friday, 18 February)
• Re: About ABBR (Friday, 18 February)

Anne Pemberton

• Re: alt text seen or not? (Friday, 21 January)

Ashli Molinero

• RE: Jobs in Web Accessibility (Wednesday, 9 February)
• RE: Imagining a Web Beyond the Browser (Wednesday, 9 February)

Brian Kelly

• Re: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Friday, 21 January)
• Approaches to accessibility auditing on Exploit Interactive web magazine (Tuesday, 11 January)

Brockbank, Leslie

• RE: Internet Week: The ADA Stalks The Internet: Is Your Web Page Illegal? (Friday, 3 March)
• RE: I am almost afraid to ask! (Thursday, 17 February)
• I am almost afraid to ask! (Thursday, 17 February)

Bruce Bailey

• RE: Questions about WCAG 6.3 (Monday, 27 March)
• RE: Questions about WCAG 6.3 (Monday, 27 March)
• RE: Questions about WCAG 6.3 (Friday, 24 March)
• RE: Definitions (Friday, 24 March)
• www.htmlhelp.com a.k.a. WDG (Thursday, 23 March)
• Definitions (Was RE: WAMM! -- I-Can Online) (Monday, 20 March)
• RE: the WAVE accessibility evaluator (Friday, 17 March)
• RE: Please review: Techniques For Evaluation And Implementation Of Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (Thursday, 16 March)
• RE: Text equivalents (Wednesday, 15 March)
• RE: WAMM! -- I-Can Online (Thursday, 9 March)
• WAMM! -- I-Can Online (Thursday, 9 March)
• Re: Tool Tip behavior (Wednesday, 8 March)
• [w3c-wai-ig] <none> (Tuesday, 7 March)
• Re: Bill Frezza (Tuesday, 7 March)
• Re: Bill Frezza (Monday, 6 March)
• Bill Frezza (Friday, 3 March)
• Tool Tip behavior (Friday, 3 March)
• RE: What's the scoop on Lynx for DOS (Friday, 3 March)
• [w3c-wai-ig] <none> (Friday, 3 March)
• RE: Tool Tip behavior (Thursday, 24 February)
• RE: Tool Tip behavior (Wednesday, 23 February)
• RE: Tool Tip behavior (Wednesday, 23 February)
• RE: Tool Tip behavior (Tuesday, 22 February)
• RE: Tool Tip behavior (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Tool Tip behavior (was RE: About ABBR) (Tuesday, 22 February)
• RE: A few comments on NIDRR's Abledata website (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Poll results for ...And Access for All (Thursday, 17 February)
• RE: [Fwd: Addition to the Record of the House Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing on Internet and ADA by Gregg Vanderheiden] (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Re: US Govt Request for E-Barrier Info (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Is this site accessible? (Tuesday, 15 February)
• RE: Is this site accessible? (Tuesday, 15 February)
• RE: Is this site accessible? (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: [Fwd: [webwatch] How is access defined?] (Sunday, 13 February)
• Re: The ADA and its application to World Wide Web sites (Friday, 11 February)
• RE: url for an article disabling access (Tuesday, 8 February)
• RE: url for an article disabling access (Tuesday, 8 February)
• RE: All Set With Access (Monday, 7 February)
• RE: WAI and the Feb 9. congressional hearing (Monday, 7 February)
• RE: WAI and the Feb 9. congressional hearing (Thursday, 3 February)
• Re: Interview w/ George Olsen of WaSP @ Adobe.com (Monday, 31 January)
• Interview w/ George Olsen of WaSP @ Adobe.com (Thursday, 27 January)
• RE: Optimizing PDF files for Accessibility (Thursday, 27 January)
• Response to Stephen Ryan editorial 01/24/00 (Thursday, 27 January)
• Re: Curtis Chung interview at Slashdot (Monday, 24 January)
• RE: FrontPage98 & Accessible Output (Friday, 21 January)
• Request for help with FrontPage! (Friday, 21 January)
• Memorandum from Paul Taylor wrt ADA and the Internet (Thursday, 20 January)
• RE: alt text seen or not? (Thursday, 20 January)
• RE: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Wednesday, 19 January)
• RE: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Wednesday, 19 January)
• RE: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Re: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Validation as test for basic accessibility (Tuesday, 18 January)
• RE: screen readers, browsers, (Tuesday, 18 January)
• Re: alt text seen or not (Tuesday, 18 January)
• Re: city of hartford site has a text only? (Monday, 17 January)
• Re: city of hartford site has a text only? (Sunday, 16 January)
• Re: city of hartford site has a text only? (Saturday, 15 January)
• RE: screen readers, browsers, & the reporting of ALT on & in image maps (Friday, 14 January)
• RE: city of hartford site has a text only? (Tuesday, 11 January)
• 1999 a Banner Year for Accessiblity (Monday, 3 January)

by way of Kelly Ford

• Re: screen readers, browsers, & the reporting of ALT on & in image maps (Thursday, 13 January)

Carine Ullom

• noframes web sites (Sunday, 5 March)

Charles F. Munat

• RE: [Fwd: [webwatch] How is access defined?] (Friday, 11 February)
• RE: [Fwd: [webwatch] How is access defined?] (Friday, 11 February)
• RE: Computerworld article on hearings (Friday, 11 February)
• Computerworld article on hearings (Friday, 11 February)
• Bad manners (Thursday, 10 February)
• The ADA and its application to World Wide Web sites (Thursday, 10 February)
• RE: Congressional hearing (Friday, 4 February)
• RE: Optimizing PDF files for Accessibility (Wednesday, 26 January)
• RE: Optimizing PDF files for Accessibility (Tuesday, 25 January)
• RE: Optimizing PDF files for Accessibility (Tuesday, 25 January)
• RE: Javascript Navigation Question ( www.freediskspace.com ) (Tuesday, 25 January)
• RE: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Friday, 21 January)
• RE: Don Norman question (Friday, 21 January)
• Oops. Misspelled Kynn. (Thursday, 20 January)
• RE: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Thursday, 20 January)
• RE: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Wednesday, 19 January)
• RE: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Wednesday, 19 January)
• RE: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Wednesday, 19 January)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: java script and p2 (Friday, 31 March)
• Re: Request for help on a project (Saturday, 25 March)
• Re: Questions about WCAG 6.3 (Saturday, 25 March)
• Re: a requestMahmut, (Saturday, 25 March)
• Re: Accessible Design / JAWS (Saturday, 25 March)
• Re: Accessible Design / JAWS (Thursday, 23 March)
• Re: Definitions (Was RE: WAMM! -- I-Can Online) (Monday, 20 March)
• Re: [REQ]: Advice concerning difficult to view web site. (Thursday, 16 March)
• Re: WAMM! -- I-Can Online (Thursday, 9 March)
• Re: Tool Tip behavior (Wednesday, 8 March)
• Re: Frames [Re: ADA Applies to Web] (Sunday, 5 March)
• Re: Netscape and IE Questions (Sunday, 5 March)
• Re: Tool Tip behavior (Sunday, 27 February)
• RE: Tool Tip behavior (Sunday, 27 February)
• Re: making an online course accessible (Thursday, 24 February)
• RE: Tool Tip behaviour (Wednesday, 23 February)
• Re: ABBR vs. ACRONYM (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: When is the "until" Satisfied in Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (Tuesday, 22 February)
• RE: ABBR vs. ACRONYM (Sunday, 20 February)
• Re: A few comments on NIDRR's Abledata website (Sunday, 20 February)
• Re: ABBR vs. ACRONYM (Sunday, 20 February)
• RE: About ABBR (Sunday, 20 February)
• Re: Making Sites Accessible (Sunday, 20 February)
• Re: Nielsen (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: I am almost afraid to ask! (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: Frames (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Re: Frames (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Re: Frames (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Re: Frames (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Re: An interesting search engine? (Tuesday, 15 February)
• RE: An interesting search engine? (Tuesday, 15 February)
• An interesting search engine? (Tuesday, 15 February)
• RE: Drop-down navigation boxes (fwd) (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: Frames [Re: ADA Applies to Web] (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: Frames [Re: ADA Applies to Web] (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: Linked text in w3c-wai-ig archives. (Sunday, 13 February)
• Re: 2nd Re: drop-down navigation (fwd) (Sunday, 13 February)
• Job Postings for Feb. 7 2000 (fwd) (Thursday, 10 February)
• RE: url for an article disabling access (Thursday, 10 February)
• Re: Computerworld Online - Does disabilities act apply to cyberspace? (Thursday, 10 February)
• Re: Jobs in Web Accessibility (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Re: Jobs in Web Accessibility (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Re: relative font size in a table. (Saturday, 22 January)
• RE: Don Norman question (Saturday, 22 January)
• RE: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Friday, 21 January)
• Re: Memorandum from Paul Taylor wrt ADA and the Internet (Friday, 21 January)
• Re: Memorandum from Paul Taylor wrt ADA and the Internet (Friday, 21 January)
• pixels, points, ems, ??? (Thursday, 20 January)
• Re: Triple Z site (Thursday, 20 January)
• RE: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Re: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Re: Test: tabindex-test (fwd) (Monday, 17 January)
• Re: noframes & Content Guidelines (Sunday, 16 January)
• Scripts on the web Re: Does CSUN Care About Web Accessibility (Sunday, 16 January)
• Re: About tabindex and bypassing link (Thursday, 13 January)
• Re: Approaches to accessibility auditing on Exploit Interactive web magazine (Tuesday, 11 January)
• Re: Accessible UI-- text-only or text-accessible? (Sunday, 9 January)
• RE: CSS-P Site Built For Accessibility (Sunday, 9 January)
• Re: CSS-P Site Built For Accessibility (Saturday, 8 January)
• Re: Request for comments: CITA (Saturday, 8 January)
• Re: CSS-P Site Built For Accessibility (Saturday, 8 January)
• RE: Testing Setup for Accessible Web Sites/Applications (Tuesday, 4 January)
• Re: Data tables, CSS simulation possible? (Monday, 3 January)
• Re: Some questions about data tables (Monday, 3 January)
• Re: Some questions about data tables (Monday, 3 January)

Christopher Atkinson

• LANG and proper names; voice browsers and roman numerals (Sunday, 27 February)

Christopher Higgs

• Re: U.S. won't release new Web site regs for review (Saturday, 26 February)

Christopher R. Maden

• RE: Don Norman question (Saturday, 22 January)
• Re: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Wednesday, 19 January)
• RE: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Wednesday, 19 January)

Chuck Baslock

• Re: Is this site accessible? (Monday, 14 February)

Chuck Hitchcock

• RE: Oracle Beehive (Saturday, 29 January)

Claude Sweet

• Re: spam message on w3c-wai-ig@w3.org (Monday, 13 March)

Crystal Allen

• Re: Wednesday's House Judiciary Hearing on the ADA and the Internet (Tuesday, 8 February)

Dan Cioci

• (IF YOU RESPOND IN 10 DAYS I WILL ALSO SEND YOU A FREE CELL (Sunday, 12 March)
• (IF YOU RESPOND IN 10 DAYS I WILL ALSO SEND YOU A FREE CELL (Sunday, 12 March)

Dan Jellinek

• email newsletter on technology for blind and visually impaired (Saturday, 29 January)

Dave Pawson

• FW: XML, Tables and Accessibility (Saturday, 18 March)
• RE: ABBR vs. ACRONYM (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: FAQ's (Tuesday, 1 February)
• Triple Z site (Thursday, 20 January)
• Re: city of hartford site has a text only? (Friday, 14 January)

David M Clark

• RE: the WAVE accessibility evaluator (Friday, 17 March)
• RE: WAMM! -- I-Can Online (Saturday, 11 March)
• RE: ABBR vs. ACRONYM (Wednesday, 23 February)
• RE: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Wednesday, 19 January)
• RE: alt text seen or not? (Tuesday, 18 January)
• RE: Seeking help on running Bobby with Jaws screen reader (Friday, 14 January)
• RE: Testing Setup for Accessible Web Sites/Applications (Wednesday, 5 January)

David Norris

• Re: ABBR vs. ACRONYM (Sunday, 20 February)
• Re: ABBR vs. ACRONYM (Sunday, 20 February)
• Re: ABBR vs. ACRONYM (Sunday, 20 February)
• Re: About ABBR (Sunday, 20 February)

David Poehlman

• Re: java script and p2 (Friday, 31 March)
• java script and p2 (Thursday, 30 March)
• [Fwd: [webwatch] my census experience] (Tuesday, 28 March)
• pushing the net for learning how to use it (Tuesday, 28 March)
• examiner article on access (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Re: Questions about WCAG 6.3 (Monday, 27 March)
• calling and listening to the web (Sunday, 26 March)
• Re: Questions about WCAG 6.3 (Saturday, 25 March)
• Re: Accessible Design / JAWS (Thursday, 23 March)
• Netscape readies new browser, wins development support (Wednesday, 22 March)
• [Fwd: NEW: WEBLANG - Web Languages] (Wednesday, 22 March)
• Internet World - The Good Side Of Regulation] (Thursday, 16 March)
• Re: Text equivalents (Wednesday, 15 March)
• article from benton foundation on accessability (Tuesday, 14 March)
• [Fwd: Fw: The ADA Stalks the Internet] (Thursday, 9 March)
• Re: WAMM! -- I-Can Online (Thursday, 9 March)
• Re: Media coverage monitoring [was: Re: Bill Frezza] (Wednesday, 8 March)
• [Fwd: IL Newsletter 1/2000] (Tuesday, 7 March)
• [Fwd: Appropriate Use of Cascading Style Sheets] (Tuesday, 7 March)
• [Fwd: Appropriate Use of Cascading Style Sheets] (Friday, 3 March)
• [Fwd: HotMetal6] (Friday, 3 March)
• we can all pack up and go home (Friday, 3 March)
• an article we should never have seen (Friday, 3 March)
• [Fwd: NEW: Make your website talk] (Thursday, 2 March)
• re post of announcement on world town meeting (Thursday, 24 February)
• announcement: important! world wide town meeting (Wednesday, 23 February)
• article about browsing with voice and listening to the web (Wednesday, 23 February)
• Re: About ABBR (Sunday, 20 February)
• [Fwd: [jobline] Short term Consult: Convert OS/2 to Windows NT] (Friday, 18 February)
• [Fwd: [webwatch] IBM Home Page Reader next version - Call for beta test candidates] (Friday, 18 February)
• [Fwd: Addition to the Record of the House Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing on Internet and ADA by Gregg Van] (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Re: An interesting search engine? (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: Is this site accessible? (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: Linked text in w3c-wai-ig archives. (Saturday, 12 February)
• Re: [Fwd: [webwatch] How is access defined?] (Saturday, 12 February)
• Re: [Fwd: [webwatch] How is access defined?] (Friday, 11 February)
• [Fwd: [webwatch] NYT: For Extra Cheese, Ctrl+Pizza] (Friday, 11 February)
• Re: Computerworld Online - Does disabilities act apply to cyberspace? (Thursday, 10 February)
• Re: Statements are now up (Wednesday, 9 February)
• the future of the web? (Wednesday, 9 February)
• url for an article disabling access (Tuesday, 8 February)
• end time for the hearing (Monday, 7 February)
• address for the hearing? (Monday, 7 February)
• dialog of interest:[Fwd: Urgent: Affirm ADA Applies to Web!] (Monday, 7 February)
• I always like to post these when I find them (Saturday, 5 February)
• Re: Congressional hearing (Friday, 4 February)
• Re: Congressional hearing (Friday, 4 February)
• front page and accessability (Friday, 4 February)
• [Fwd: FW: News on Assistive Technology] (Thursday, 3 February)
• please read and note:[Fwd: ADA Internet Hearing Set] (Thursday, 3 February)
• CERT Advisory CA-2000-02 (Thursday, 3 February)
• [Fwd: Adobe and IRS event on PDF accessibility] (Thursday, 3 February)
• on behalf of the modorator of advanced html (Monday, 31 January)
• re: User Agent Accessibility Guidelines become Candidate Recommendation] (Sunday, 30 January)
• Re: usability issues with JavaScript (fwd) (Wednesday, 26 January)
• appache question answered (Wednesday, 26 January)
• epatch, ipatchae ipache? (Wednesday, 26 January)
• Re: Optimizing PDF files for Accessibility (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: Thanks, but not now due to IE or MS racketeering type practices (Tuesday, 25 January)
• a site in scotland (Sunday, 23 January)
• about php (Saturday, 22 January)
• richmond va times dispatch article on new library workstation (Saturday, 22 January)
• [Fwd: Media Access Newsletter] (Saturday, 22 January)
• [Fwd: Re: can't read fortune] (Friday, 21 January)
• Re: Memorandum from Paul Taylor wrt ADA and the Internet (Thursday, 20 January)
• Re: Triple Z site (Thursday, 20 January)
• Re: alt text seen or not? (Thursday, 20 January)
• Re: alt text seen or not? (Thursday, 20 January)
• Re: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Re: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Wednesday, 19 January)
• an interesting but I fear inaccessible url (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Re: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Re: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Re: alt text seen or not? (Monday, 17 January)
• alt text seen or not? (Monday, 17 January)
• special alert available (Monday, 17 January)
• [Fwd: Art's web site updated] (Monday, 17 January)
• Re: city of hartford site has a text only? (Monday, 17 January)
• Re: city of hartford site has a text only? (Saturday, 15 January)
• [Fwd: ADA Compliant Web Sites] (Friday, 14 January)
• Re: screen readers, browsers, & the reporting of ALT on & in image maps (Thursday, 13 January)
• Re: screen readers, browsers, & the reporting of ALT on & in image maps (Thursday, 13 January)
• Re: city of hartford site has a text only? (Wednesday, 12 January)
• Re: city of hartford site has a text only? (Tuesday, 11 January)
• city of hartford site has a text only? (Monday, 10 January)
• Re: Second Browser Window Question (Monday, 10 January)
• an interesting report on nassa accessability (Monday, 10 January)
• could this happen to you?[Fwd: Greater Good and Accessibility] (Sunday, 9 January)
• a bit off the track perhaps but...[Fwd: January-February Issue of The Technology Source] (Friday, 7 January)
• Re: Accessible UI-- text-only or text-accessible? (Thursday, 6 January)
• Re: Testing Setup for Accessible Web Sites/Applications (Wednesday, 5 January)
• Re: 1999 a Banner Year for Accessiblity (Tuesday, 4 January)

Denise Koschmann

• Re: Statements are now up (Wednesday, 9 February)

Dick Brown

• RE: Text equivalents (Thursday, 16 March)
• RE: About ABBR (Friday, 18 February)
• RE: New York Times web site (Friday, 11 February)

Dine, Brooke

• RE: Is this site accessible? (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Is this site accessible? (Monday, 14 February)
• RE: WAI and the Feb 9. congressional hearing (Monday, 7 February)

Don OCallaghan

• Access for cognitive disabilities (Saturday, 22 January)

Donald L. Day

• Call for Papers Reminder (May 1 Deadline) (Thursday, 23 March)

Eileen Bonfiglio

• RE: Request for help with FrontPage! (Saturday, 22 January)

Emma Easton

• UK Initiatives and the DDA (Thursday, 17 February)

Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo

• RE: ABBR vs. ACRONYM (Wednesday, 23 February)
• RE: ABBR vs. ACRONYM (Tuesday, 22 February)
• RE: ABBR vs. ACRONYM (Tuesday, 22 February)
• RE: ABBR vs. ACRONYM (Sunday, 20 February)

EMRE EVREN (MR-TMO)

• REMOVE (Tuesday, 28 March)

Francisco Godinho

• eEurope - EC Progress Report Online (Saturday, 11 March)
• Fw: eEurope initiative for the Information Society for All: discussion group (Wednesday, 12 January)

geoff freed

• CORRECTION: MAGpie 1.0 release (Friday, 17 March)
• MAGpie 1.0 Release (Friday, 17 March)
• Display Notification: LANG and proper names; voice browsers and roman numerals (Monday, 28 February)

Gerald G. Weichbrodt

• Accessibly Changing Page Content on the Fly (Thursday, 9 March)
• Re: Appropriate Use of Style Sheets, Sliding Menus, Etc. (Wednesday, 8 March)
• Appropriate Use of Style Sheets, Sliding Menus, Etc. (Wednesday, 8 March)

Gerard Malcolm

• FAQ's (Tuesday, 1 February)

Glenda Watson Hyatt

• Re: Statements are now up (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Re: Statements are now up (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Congressional hearing (Friday, 4 February)
• Re: Optimizing PDF files for Accessibility (Wednesday, 26 January)

Greg Rice

• Thanks, but not now due to IE or MS racketeering type practices (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Thanks, but not now due to IE or MS racketeering type practices (Tuesday, 25 January)

Gregg Vanderheiden

• FW: HCI Usability-Accessibility Evaluation (Saturday, 11 March)
• New FCC NOI (Tuesday, 22 February)

Gregory J. Rosmaita

• Re: [REQ]: Advice concerning difficult to view web site. (Friday, 17 March)
• RE: What's the scoop on Lynx for DOS (Friday, 3 March)
• Re: What's the scoop on Lynx for DOS (Friday, 3 March)
• Re: LANG and proper names; voice browsers and roman numerals (Monday, 28 February)
• RE: Tool Tip behavior (Saturday, 26 February)
• RE: Tool Tip behavior (Wednesday, 23 February)
• RE: ABBR vs. ACRONYM (Wednesday, 23 February)
• RE: ABBR vs. ACRONYM (Wednesday, 23 February)
• RE: Tool Tip behavior (Wednesday, 23 February)
• RE: Tool Tip behavior (Wednesday, 23 February)
• RE: ABBR vs. ACRONYM (Tuesday, 22 February)
• RE: Tool Tip behavior (Tuesday, 22 February)
• RE: ABBR vs. ACRONYM (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: ABBR vs. ACRONYM (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: Tool Tip behavior (was RE: About ABBR) (Tuesday, 22 February)
• RE: About ABBR (and ACRONYM) (Sunday, 20 February)
• Re: ABBR vs. ACRONYM (Sunday, 20 February)
• RE: About ABBR (Sunday, 20 February)
• RE: About ABBR (Sunday, 20 February)
• Re: About ABBR (Friday, 18 February)
• Re: About ABBR (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: About ABBR (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: Frames redux (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Re: Frames (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Re: Frames [Re: ADA Applies to Web] (Wednesday, 16 February)
• RE: Drop-down navigation boxes (fwd) (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Re: Is this site accessible? (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: Frames [Re: ADA Applies to Web] (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: Labelling web page functionality for blind users (Monday, 14 February)
• RE: New York Times web site (Friday, 11 February)
• Re: New York Times web site (Thursday, 10 February)
• Re: New York Times web site (Thursday, 10 February)
• Re: Computerworld Online - Does disabilities act apply to cyberspace? (Thursday, 10 February)
• Re: Update on audio link to congressional hearing (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Re: Trouble with Judiciary live audio (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Re: Audio link for congress hearing on ADA and the internet (Wednesday, 9 February)
• listening to the Feb 9. committee hearing via the net (Monday, 7 February)
• RE: screen readers, browsers, & the reporting of ALT on & in image maps (Tuesday, 18 January)
• Re: screen readers, browsers, & the reporting of ALT on & in image maps (Wednesday, 12 January)
• screen readers, browsers, & the reporting of ALT on & in image maps (Wednesday, 12 January)
• new mail archives format (was Re: EOWG Agenda, Jan 7, 2000) (Friday, 7 January)

Harvey Bingham

• RE: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Thursday, 20 January)

HASAN KHIMJEE

• Re: Request for help on a project (Friday, 31 March)

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

• Re: how to prevent the infinite http redirection (Wednesday, 26 January)

IIDisab@aol.com

• Inter-American Dialog on Disability & Development (Thursday, 9 March)

Jamal Mazrui

• Seeking help on running Bobby with Jaws screen reader (Friday, 14 January)

James Boyd

• Request for help on a project (Friday, 24 March)

Jamie Fox

• RE: FrontPage98 & Accessible Output (Monday, 24 January)
• RE: FrontPage98 & Accessible Output (Friday, 21 January)
• RE: Memorandum from Paul Taylor wrt ADA and the Internet (Friday, 21 January)
• RE: FrontPage98 & Accessible Output (Friday, 21 January)
• RE: Testing Setup for Accessible Web Sites/Applications (Tuesday, 4 January)

Jason White

• Re: ABBR vs. ACRONYM (Monday, 21 February)

Jeffrey pledger

• AbleTV.net's schedule for webcasting at CSUN . . . (Tuesday, 21 March)
• Re: U.S. won't release new Web site regs for review (Saturday, 26 February)
• Re: U.S. won't release new Web site regs for review (Saturday, 26 February)
• RE: An interesting search engine? (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: Optimizing PDF files for Accessibility (Tuesday, 25 January)

JMMAW@aol.com

• Two Hits (Wednesday, 15 March)
• My AT Column (Wednesday, 1 March)
• My Tech Column (Wednesday, 23 February)
• Tech Column (Thursday, 10 February)
• My Tech COLUMN (Wednesday, 9 February)
• My AT Column (Wednesday, 2 February)
• My Tech Column (Wednesday, 26 January)
• Today's Tech Column (Wednesday, 19 January)

Joan Piroch

• Re: how do you teach good taste (Thursday, 20 January)

Joel Sanda

• My Concluding Thoughts on WCAG #6.3 (Tuesday, 28 March)
• RE: Questions about WCAG 6.3 (Monday, 27 March)
• RE: Questions about WCAG 6.3 (Monday, 27 March)
• Re: Questions about WCAG 6.3 (Sunday, 26 March)
• RE: Questions about WCAG 6.3 (Friday, 24 March)
• Questions about WCAG 6.3 (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: [Fwd: Appropriate Use of Cascading Style Sheets] (Sunday, 5 March)
• Netscape and IE Questions (Friday, 3 March)
• Second Browser Window Question (Monday, 10 January)
• RE: CSS-P Site Built For Accessibility (Sunday, 9 January)
• Re: CSS-P Site Built For Accessibility (Saturday, 8 January)
• CSS-P Site Built For Accessibility (Thursday, 6 January)

John Nissen

• Frames [Re: ADA Applies to Web] (Saturday, 12 February)
• 2nd Re: drop-down navigation (fwd) (Saturday, 12 February)
• Drop-down navigation boxes (fwd) (Saturday, 12 February)
• Don Norman question (Thursday, 20 January)

Jonathan Chetwynd

• Re: www.htmlhelp.com a.k.a. WDG (Friday, 24 March)
• Internet in a box (Saturday, 18 March)
• Re: [Fwd: Appropriate Use of Cascading Style Sheets] (Saturday, 4 March)
• Re: ABBR vs. ACRONYM (Wednesday, 23 February)
• Re: Nielsen (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: Frames (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Re: An interesting search engine? (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: [Fwd: [webwatch] How is access defined?] (Saturday, 12 February)
• keystrokes (Saturday, 12 February)
• Re: [Fwd: [webwatch] How is access defined?] (Saturday, 12 February)
• Re: Linked text in w3c-wai-ig archives. (Saturday, 12 February)
• Re: New York Times web site (Friday, 11 February)
• Re: how do you teach good taste (Wednesday, 26 January)
• Re: Javascript Navigation Question ( www.freediskspace.com ) (Wednesday, 26 January)
• Re: Memorandum from Paul Taylor wrt ADA and the Internet (Friday, 21 January)
• Re: how do you teach good taste (Thursday, 20 January)
• relative font size in a table. (Tuesday, 18 January)
• 'experience shows that users rely more on the examples than on the formal specifications in using design standards.' Jakob Nielson (Friday, 14 January)
• Re: Online graphical demo of WAI Guidelines (Thursday, 13 January)
• Online graphical demo of WAI Guidelines (Tuesday, 11 January)
• www accessibility: BETT website drops 'alt tags' (Tuesday, 11 January)
• Re: CSS-P Site Built For Accessibility (Saturday, 8 January)
• Re: HTA (Wednesday, 5 January)
• HTA (Wednesday, 5 January)
• Re: Testing Setup for Accessible Web Sites/Applications (Wednesday, 5 January)

Judy Brewer

• US Sec. 508 NPRM Available, including Web sections (Friday, 31 March)
• Re: Media coverage monitoring (Friday, 31 March)
• WAI at CSUN 2000! (Friday, 17 March)
• Re: spam message on w3c-wai-ig@w3.org (Tuesday, 14 March)
• User Agent Accessibility Guidelines promoted to W3C Proposed Recommendation (Saturday, 11 March)
• Media coverage monitoring [was: Re: Bill Frezza] (Wednesday, 8 March)
• Re: Bill Frezza (Monday, 6 March)
• Registration pages available for WAI meetings before and after CSUN (Wednesday, 16 February)
• RE: Computerworld article on hearings (Friday, 11 February)
• Some follow-up thoughts on the US ADA/Web Hearing (Friday, 11 February)
• Reminder about use of the WAI Interest Group mailing list (Thursday, 10 February)
• Re: Hearing on ADA and the Internet (Thursday, 10 February)
• WAI Meetings around CSUN, Confirmed Schedule (Friday, 4 February)
• fwd: Re: WAI and the Feb 9. congressional hearing (Thursday, 3 February)
• Re: WAI and the Feb 9. congressional hearing (Thursday, 3 February)
• W3C Issues Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines as a Recommendation (Thursday, 3 February)
• User Agent Accessibility Guidelines become Candidate Recommendation (Saturday, 29 January)
• Call for Participation, Renewed Web Content Accessibility Guidelines WG (Saturday, 22 January)
• WAI Meetings around CSUN, Tentative Schedule (Saturday, 22 January)
• Re: new mail archives format (was Re: EOWG Agenda, Jan 7, 2000) (Friday, 7 January)
• Re: Updated policy page links, check it out (Friday, 7 January)
• Updated policy page links, check it out (Wednesday, 5 January)

Judy Schnitzer

• Re: Frames (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Re: Frames (Wednesday, 16 February)

Karl Ove Hufthammer

• Re: Please review: Techniques For Evaluation And Implementation Of Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (Friday, 17 March)
• Re: Tool Tip behavior (Saturday, 26 February)
• Re: ABBR vs. ACRONYM (Monday, 21 February)

karl.hebenstreit@gsa.gov

• Request for comments: CITA (Wednesday, 5 January)

Kathleen Anderson

• Media: INTERNET WORLD NEWS, March 31, 2000] (Saturday, 1 April)
• The Good Side Of Regulation - Internet World (Thursday, 16 March)
• Bill Frezza and the ADA (Thursday, 16 March)
• Local government web sites fail blind Net users (Saturday, 11 March)
• U.S. won't release new Web site regs for review (Friday, 25 February)
• ComputerWorld Article in Print - Congress Considers ADA's Relevance to Web (Tuesday, 15 February)
• [Fwd: INTERNET WORLD NEWS, February 09, 2000] (Thursday, 10 February)
• Re: Computerworld Online - Does disabilities act apply to cyberspace? (Thursday, 10 February)
• Computerworld Online - Does disabilities act apply to cyberspace? (Thursday, 10 February)
• Oversight hearing on "The Applicability of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Re: Fw: Wednesday's House Judiciary Hearing on the ADA and theInternet (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Fw: Wednesday's House Judiciary Hearing on the ADA and the Internet (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: fwd: Re: WAI and the Feb 9. congressional hearing (Friday, 4 February)
• The History Channel: The Internet: Behind the Web (Monday, 31 January)
• Opinion Piece in Government Computer News (Wednesday, 26 January)
• Re: alt text seen or not? (Thursday, 20 January)
• Re: alt text seen or not? (Thursday, 20 January)
• Re: alt text seen or not? (Monday, 17 January)
• Re: alt text seen or not? (Monday, 17 January)
• Re: alt text seen or not? (Monday, 17 January)
• Re: city of hartford site has a text only? (Sunday, 16 January)
• Re: city of hartford site has a text only? (Saturday, 15 January)
• Re: city of hartford site has a text only? (Saturday, 15 January)
• Re: screen readers, browsers, & the reporting of ALT on & in image maps (Wednesday, 12 January)
• Re: city of hartford site has a text only? (Monday, 10 January)

Kelly Ford

• Re: the WAVE accessibility evaluator (Friday, 17 March)
• Internet Week: The ADA Stalks The Internet: Is Your Web Page Illegal? (Thursday, 2 March)
• Re: U.S. won't release new Web site regs for review (Friday, 25 February)
• When is the "until" Satisfied in Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Texas Web Accessibility Guidelines Legislation (Wednesday, 16 February)
• AP: Internet, Disabilities Act Examined (Wednesday, 9 February)
• List of Witnesses for the Hearing (Wednesday, 2 February)
• Urgent request to blind Net users in the UK (Tuesday, 1 February)
• Re: Memorandum from Paul Taylor wrt ADA and the Internet (Friday, 21 January)
• CSUN Seems to Have Corrected Things: http://www.csun.edu/cod/conf2000/proceedingsmainpage.html (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Subcommittee on the Constitution Member List (Sunday, 16 January)
• Fwd: Congressional hearing on ADA and Internet (Sunday, 16 January)
• Does CSUN Care About Web Accessibility: http://www.csun.edu/cod/conf2000/proceedings.html (Saturday, 15 January)
• Is This the Future...: http://turbotaxweb.intuit.com (Saturday, 15 January)
• Re: screen readers, browsers, & the reporting of ALT on & in image maps (Thursday, 13 January)
• Re: screen readers, browsers, & the reporting of ALT on & in image maps (Wednesday, 12 January)

Kynn Bartlett

• Premo Web Talkster -- any experience? (Sunday, 19 March)
• Re: Bill Frezza and the ADA (Thursday, 16 March)
• RE: WAMM! -- I-Can Online (Thursday, 9 March)
• Re: Bill Frezza (Monday, 6 March)
• RE: Tool Tip behavior (Saturday, 26 February)
• RE: Tool Tip behavior (Friday, 25 February)
• RE: ABBR vs. ACRONYM (Friday, 25 February)
• Re: U.S. won't release new Web site regs for review (Friday, 25 February)
• Re: Tool Tip behavior (was RE: About ABBR) (Friday, 25 February)
• RE: Tool Tip behavior (Friday, 25 February)
• Re: making an online course accessible (Friday, 25 February)
• Re: U.S. won't release new Web site regs for review (Friday, 25 February)
• Re: ABBR vs. ACRONYM (Sunday, 20 February)
• Re: ABBR vs. ACRONYM (Sunday, 20 February)
• Re: ABBR vs. ACRONYM (Sunday, 20 February)
• Re: About ABBR (Sunday, 20 February)
• RE: About ABBR (Sunday, 20 February)
• ABBR vs. ACRONYM (Sunday, 20 February)
• RE: About ABBR (Saturday, 19 February)
• Re: Making Sites Accessible (Saturday, 19 February)
• RE: About accesskey (Saturday, 19 February)
• RE: About ABBR (Saturday, 19 February)
• RE: About ABBR (Saturday, 19 February)
• RE: About ABBR (Saturday, 19 February)
• Re: About ABBR (Saturday, 19 February)
• Re: Nielsen (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: Nielsen (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: Article on accessibility rational implementation (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: Survey says.... (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: ComputerWorld Article in Print - Congress Considers ADA's Relevance to Web (Tuesday, 15 February)
• RE: Computerworld article on hearings (Friday, 11 February)
• Re: Computerworld article on hearings (Friday, 11 February)
• RE: New York Times web site (Friday, 11 February)
• RE: New York Times web site (Friday, 11 February)
• Re: Some follow-up thoughts on the US ADA/Web Hearing (Friday, 11 February)
• Re: Computerworld Online - Does disabilities act apply to cyberspace? (Thursday, 10 February)
• Walter Olson (Thursday, 10 February)
• Re: Computerworld Online - Does disabilities act apply to cyberspace? (Thursday, 10 February)
• Re: Hearing on ADA and the Internet (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Statements are now up (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Re: Audio link for congress hearing on ADA and the internet (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Re: Who's Who at the House Hearing (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Who's Who at the House Hearing (Wednesday, 9 February)
• C-SPAN Schedule for 9 Feb 2000 (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Jobs in Web Accessibility (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Web Accessibility article on Slashdot (Monday, 7 February)
• Re: fwd: Re: WAI and the Feb 9. congressional hearing (Thursday, 3 February)
• Re: List of Witnesses for the Hearing (Wednesday, 2 February)
• Re: Interview w/ George Olsen of WaSP @ Adobe.com (Monday, 31 January)
• Re: Interview w/ George Olsen of WaSP @ Adobe.com (Friday, 28 January)
• Re: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Saturday, 22 January)
• Re: about php (Saturday, 22 January)
• RE: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Saturday, 22 January)
• RE: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Saturday, 22 January)
• RE: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Saturday, 22 January)
• RE: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Saturday, 22 January)
• Please Respond Privately: Virtual Dog Show Accessibility (Saturday, 22 January)
• Re: how do you teach good taste (Thursday, 20 January)
• RE: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Re: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Re: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Wednesday, 19 January)
• RE: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Re: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Re: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Monday, 18 January)
• Re: Fwd: Congressional hearing on ADA and Internet (Monday, 17 January)
• WAI/RNIB Video (Friday, 14 January)
• Fwd: Re: HTA (Wednesday, 5 January)
• Re: HTA (Wednesday, 5 January)
• Re: 1999 a Banner Year for Accessiblity (Tuesday, 4 January)

Lakespur Roca

• Short survey for keyboard navigation. (Friday, 31 March)
• Re: About ABBR (Friday, 18 February)

Laurie Harrison

• UD Conference in Montreal 2001 - Call for papers (Thursday, 9 March)

Leonard R. Kasday

• Request to look at WAVE output with screenreader. (Saturday, 18 March)
• Re: the WAVE accessibility evaluator (Saturday, 18 March)
• RE: the WAVE accessibility evaluator (Friday, 17 March)
• RE: the WAVE accessibility evaluator (Friday, 17 March)
• the WAVE accessibility evaluator (Thursday, 16 March)
• RE: Tool Tip behavior (Saturday, 26 February)
• RE: Tool Tip behavior (Friday, 25 February)
• RE: Tool Tip behavior (Thursday, 24 February)
• Oracle Beehive (Wednesday, 26 January)
• RE: FrontPage98 & Accessible Output (Friday, 21 January)
• Re: Triple Z site (Friday, 21 January)
• RE: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Thursday, 20 January)
• RE: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Wednesday, 19 January)
• RE: screen readers, browsers, & the reporting of ALT on & in image maps (Monday, 17 January)
• RE: screen readers, browsers, & the reporting of ALT on & in image maps (Friday, 14 January)
• Re: screen readers, browsers, & the reporting of ALT on & in image maps (Thursday, 13 January)
• Re: screen readers, browsers, & the reporting of ALT on & in image maps (Thursday, 13 January)
• Re: screen readers, browsers, & the reporting of ALT on & in image maps (Wednesday, 12 January)
• Re: screen readers, browsers, & the reporting of ALT on & in image maps (Wednesday, 12 January)
• RE: city of hartford site has a text only? (Tuesday, 11 January)
• Re: Some questions about data tables (Friday, 7 January)
• Re: Some questions about data tables (Tuesday, 4 January)
• Re: Some questions about data tables (Monday, 3 January)

Lincinfo@aol.com

• Re: Nielsen (Friday, 18 February)

Lloyd G. Rasmussen

• RE: WEB/LAW: U.S. won't release new Web site regs for review (Friday, 25 February)
• Re: Computerworld Online - Does disabilities act apply to cyberspace? (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Re: Frames redux (Wednesday, 16 February)

Loretta Guarino Reid

• Re: Optimizing PDF files for Accessibility (Tuesday, 25 January)

Lyceum Academy

• Appropriate: Fw: laser printer toner cartridges? (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Re: Premo Web Talkster -- any experience? (Monday, 20 March)

Lynn Alford

• making an online course accessible (Wednesday, 23 February)

Madeleine Rothberg

• Trouble with Judiciary live audio (Wednesday, 9 February)

Mahmut Dag

• a request (Saturday, 25 March)

Marc

• Need Web Accessibilty Specialists (Saturday, 29 January)

Marjolein Katsma

• Re: Tool Tip behavior (Wednesday, 8 March)
• Re: Tool Tip behavior (Friday, 3 March)
• Re: What's the scoop on Lynx for DOS (Friday, 3 March)
• Re: [w3c-wai-ig] <none> (Friday, 3 March)
• RE: ABBR vs. ACRONYM (Wednesday, 23 February)
• RE: ABBR vs. ACRONYM (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: ABBR vs. ACRONYM (Sunday, 20 February)
• Re: A few comments on NIDRR's Abledata website (Saturday, 19 February)
• Re: A few comments on NIDRR's Abledata website (Saturday, 19 February)
• HomeSite users? *Non*-sighted help needed! (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Re: LONGDESC usage statistics (Monday, 14 February)

Mark Andrew Nassy

• [SUMMARY]: Advice concerning difficult to view web site. (Sunday, 19 March)
• [REQ]: Advice concerning difficult to view web site. (Thursday, 16 March)
• Re: Frames [Re: ADA Applies to Web] (Wednesday, 16 February)

Marti

• Re: Internet Week: The ADA Stalks The Internet: Is Your Web Page Illegal? (Friday, 3 March)
• JavaScript Links (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: Nielsen (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: Frames (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Re: Is this site accessible? (Monday, 14 February)

Marti McCuller

• Re: Computerworld Online - Does disabilities act apply to cyberspace? (Thursday, 10 February)

McCain, Tom

• RE: Tool Tip behavior (Monday, 13 March)

McDonald, Ira

• RE: ABBR vs. ACRONYM (Monday, 21 February)
• RE: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Wednesday, 19 January)

Melinda Morris-Black

• Re: the WAVE accessibility evaluator (Friday, 17 March)
• Public Key Infrastructure (Tuesday, 7 March)
• Re: U.S. won't release new Web site regs for review (Friday, 25 February)
• Re: making an online course accessible (Wednesday, 23 February)
• Re: Frames (Thursday, 17 February)
• Frames redux (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Frames (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: Optimizing PDF files for Accessibility (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: Optimizing PDF files for Accessibility (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: Optimizing PDF files for Accessibility (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Optimizing PDF files for Accessibility (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Wednesday, 19 January)

Michael Burks

• RE: An interesting Concept (Sunday, 5 March)
• An interesting Concept (Saturday, 4 March)
• RE: Article on accessibility rational implementation (Thursday, 17 February)
• RE: UK Initiatives and the DDA (Thursday, 17 February)
• RE: New York Times web site (Friday, 11 February)
• RE: [Fwd: INTERNET WORLD NEWS, February 09, 2000] (Thursday, 10 February)
• RE: Statements are now up (Wednesday, 9 February)
• RE: Trouble with Judiciary live audio (Wednesday, 9 February)
• RE: Congressional hearing (Saturday, 5 February)
• RE: FrontPage98 & Accessible Output (Friday, 21 January)

Michael Cooper

• Bobby Programmer (Wednesday, 22 March)
• RE: Seeking help on running Bobby with Jaws screen reader (Friday, 21 January)

Mike Wagner

• RE: WAMM! -- I-Can Online (Sunday, 12 March)
• Re: WAMM! -- I-Can Online (Friday, 10 March)

mlklein76@address.com

• Real Cash, Real Profit....Believe it !!! (Tuesday, 21 March)

Neff, Robert

• RE: Fed Web is here (Wednesday, 8 March)
• Fed Web is here (Wednesday, 8 March)
• RE: About accesskey (Saturday, 19 February)
• RE: About ABBR (Saturday, 19 February)
• RE: About ABBR (Saturday, 19 February)
• RE: Is this site accessible? (Tuesday, 15 February)
• RE: Statements are now up (Wednesday, 9 February)
• RE: WAI and the Feb 9. congressional hearing (Saturday, 5 February)
• RE: Optimizing PDF files for Accessibility (Tuesday, 25 January)
• RE: Triple Z site (Thursday, 20 January)
• RE: Fwd: Congressional hearing on ADA and Internet (Monday, 17 January)

Patrick Burke

• Re: Bill Frezza (Tuesday, 7 March)
• RE: An interesting Concept (Sunday, 5 March)
• Re: An interesting Concept (Saturday, 4 March)
• Re: LANG and proper names; voice browsers and roman numerals (Monday, 28 February)
• Copyright Vs. Accessibility ( www.lyrics.ch ) (Wednesday, 23 February)
• Re: Frames [Re: ADA Applies to Web] (Monday, 14 February)
• Javascript Navigation Question ( www.freediskspace.com ) (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: how do you teach good taste (Thursday, 20 January)
• Re: Triple Z site (Thursday, 20 January)
• Re: WAI/RNIB Video (Friday, 14 January)
• Re: screen readers, browsers, & the reporting of ALT on & in image maps (Thursday, 13 January)
• Re: screen readers, browsers, & the reporting of ALT on & in image maps (Wednesday, 12 January)
• Re: screen readers, browsers, & the reporting of ALT on & in image maps (Wednesday, 12 January)

Patrick McCuller: Earthlink

• Hearing on ADA and the Internet (Wednesday, 9 February)

Paul Bohman

• Re: [REQ]: Advice concerning difficult to view web site. (Thursday, 16 March)
• Re: Accessibly Changing Page Content on the Fly (Thursday, 9 March)
• Re: Accessibly Changing Page Content on the Fly (Thursday, 9 March)
• Re: WAMM! -- I-Can Online (Thursday, 9 March)
• Re: Wednesday's House Judiciary Hearing on the ADA and the Internet (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: epatch, ipatchae ipache? (Wednesday, 26 January)
• Re: Javascript Navigation Question ( www.freediskspace.com ) (Tuesday, 25 January)

Paul Booth

• RE: Questions about WCAG 6.3 (Saturday, 25 March)
• Macromedia Flash (Wednesday, 22 March)
• Re: a site in scotland (Monday, 24 January)
• noframes & Content Guidelines (Thursday, 13 January)
• Re: Online graphical demo of WAI Guidelines (Thursday, 13 January)

peter.b.l.meijer@philips.com

• LONGDESC usage statistics? (Thursday, 13 January)

pjenkins@us.ibm.com

• IBM joining forces with Mozilla for accessibility (Thursday, 2 March)
• RE: Tool Tip behavior (Wednesday, 23 February)
• RE: ABBR vs. ACRONYM (Wednesday, 23 February)
• RE: Tool Tip behavior (Tuesday, 22 February)
• RE: ABBR vs. ACRONYM (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: About ABBR (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: An article about Yahoo's simplicity of design (Wednesday, 2 February)
• Re: alt text seen or not? (Wednesday, 19 January)
• RE: alt text seen or not? (Tuesday, 18 January)
• Re: alt text seen or not? (Monday, 17 January)
• Re: alt text seen or not? (Monday, 17 January)
• Re: screen readers, browsers, & the reporting of ALT on & in image maps (Wednesday, 12 January)

r2d2@ureach.com

• laser printer toner cartridges (Tuesday, 28 March)

Rafael Romero

• Article on accessibility rational implementation (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: Frames (Opera options) (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Re: Updated policy page links, check it out (Wednesday, 5 January)

Reidy Brown

• how do you teach good taste (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Accessible UI-- text-only or text-accessible? (Thursday, 6 January)
• Testing Setup for Accessible Web Sites/Applications (Tuesday, 4 January)

remove@wadsofcash.com

• GUARANTEED SUCCESS FORMULA (Friday, 21 January)

Ricardo Sanchez

• About IE 5 for Mac (Saturday, 1 April)
• Re: ABBR vs. ACRONYM (Sunday, 20 February)
• RE: About accesskey (Sunday, 20 February)
• About ABBR (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: about php (Saturday, 22 January)
• About tabindex and bypassing link (Thursday, 13 January)

Richard Premack

• Internet World 2000 Conference (Tuesday, 21 March)
• Re: Frames [Re: ADA Applies to Web] (Tuesday, 15 February)

Robert Neff

• check out the session on 508 at FOSE -LEARN MORE ABOUT SECTION 508... (Friday, 17 March)
• Re: reminder, meeting tomorrow Friday February 18 (Tuesday, 22 February)

Robin Carey

• a link maybe? (Wednesday, 12 January)

Scott Luebking

• A new site in preview mode looking for feedback (Thursday, 30 March)
• SlashDot interview with Jakob Nielsen (Sunday, 5 March)
• Re: A poll for screen reader users (Thursday, 2 March)
• An example of a form with linked error messages (Wednesday, 1 March)
• Ask Jakob Nielsen questions (Tuesday, 29 February)
• A poll for screen reader users (Saturday, 26 February)
• Re: ABBR (Sunday, 20 February)
• Re: A few comments on NIDRR's Abledata website (Saturday, 19 February)
• RE: About ABBR (Saturday, 19 February)
• Re: A few comments on NIDRR's Abledata website (Saturday, 19 February)
• A few comments on NIDRR's Abledata website (Saturday, 19 February)
• Proposed label: format for screen reader (Saturday, 19 February)
• NIDRR's Abledata website (Saturday, 19 February)
• Re: Labelling web page functionality for blind users (Thursday, 17 February)
• RE: New York Times web site (Friday, 11 February)
• RE: New York Times web site (Friday, 11 February)
• Re: New York Times web site (Friday, 11 February)
• Re: New York Times web site (Thursday, 10 February)
• New York Times web site (Thursday, 10 February)
• Re: Computerworld Online - Does disabilities act apply to cyberspace? (Thursday, 10 February)
• Re: Update on audio link to congressional hearing (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Update on audio link to congressional hearing (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Audio link for congress hearing on ADA and the internet (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Imagining a Web Beyond the Browser (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Symposium on smart graphics (Wednesday, 9 February)
• RE: WAI and the Feb 9. congressional hearing (Monday, 7 February)
• Re: WAI and the Feb 9. congressional hearing (Saturday, 5 February)
• WAI and the Feb 9. congressional hearing (Wednesday, 2 February)
• A posting on screen readers and checking out web page accessibility (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: Some questions about data tables (Saturday, 8 January)

Seelman, Kate

• RE: listening to the Feb 9. committee hearing via the net (Monday, 7 February)

Steven McCaffrey

• listening to the web, another article. (Wednesday, 29 March)
• Re: Accessible Design / JAWS (Thursday, 23 March)
• Re: Accessible Design / JAWS (Thursday, 23 March)
• Re: the WAVE accessibility evaluator (Friday, 17 March)
• Re: Frames (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: Frames (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Linked text in w3c-wai-ig archives. (Friday, 11 February)
• Re: Fw: Wednesday's House Judiciary Hearing on the ADA and the Internet (Tuesday, 8 February)
• RE: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Friday, 21 January)
• RE: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Thursday, 20 January)
• RE: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Re: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Wednesday, 19 January)
• screen readers, browsers, & the reporting of ALT on & in image (Test 2) (Wednesday, 12 January)
• screen readers, browsers, & the reporting of ALT on & in image maps (Wednesday, 12 January)
• Re: Accessible UI-- text-only or text-accessible? (Friday, 7 January)
• Re: Some questions about data tables (Tuesday, 4 January)
• Data tables, CSS simulation possible? (Monday, 3 January)

Susan Hill

• Re: screen readers, browsers, & the reporting of ALT on & in image maps (Wednesday, 12 January)

T. V. Raman

• Re: Some questions about data tables (Wednesday, 12 January)
• Re: Some questions about data tables (Friday, 7 January)

Taylor-Made

• Spammed?? (Sunday, 12 March)
• Re: Netscape and IE Questions (Friday, 3 March)
• Re: Making Sites Accessible (Saturday, 19 February)
• Making Sites Accessible (Friday, 18 February)
• JavaScript Links (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: Frames (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Re: Is this site accessible? (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: city of hartford site has a text only? (Saturday, 15 January)
• Re: city of hartford site has a text only? (Saturday, 15 January)
• Re: city of hartford site has a text only? (Tuesday, 11 January)

Terry Hammon

• Accessible Design / JAWS (Thursday, 23 March)
• Accessible Design / JAWS (Thursday, 23 March)

thatch@us.ibm.com

• Re: WAMM! -- I-Can Online (Thursday, 9 March)
• Re: WAMM! -- I-Can Online (Thursday, 9 March)
• RE: Tool Tip behavior (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: About ABBR (Saturday, 19 February)
• Re: About ABBR (Friday, 18 February)
• Re: About ABBR (Friday, 18 February)
• Re: Frames (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: Statements are now up (Wednesday, 9 February)
• IBM Accessibility Guidelines (Friday, 4 February)

Thomas Dowling

• Re: www.htmlhelp.com a.k.a. WDG (Thursday, 23 March)
• Re: ABBR vs. ACRONYM (Sunday, 20 February)
• Re: Jobs in Web Accessibility (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Re: appache question answered (Wednesday, 26 January)

Tu Yu-Guang

• how to prevent the infinite http redirection (Tuesday, 25 January)

Waddell, Cynthia

• American Bar Update on ADA Articles (Saturday, 18 March)
• FW: Bank Commits to Accessible Online Banking (Thursday, 16 March)
• FW: Supreme Court Abandons ADA Case (Thursday, 2 March)
• Teleconference Today on Accessible Web (Wednesday, 16 February)
• US Govt Request for E-Barrier Info (Monday, 14 February)
• RE: [Fwd: INTERNET WORLD NEWS, February 09, 2000] (Thursday, 10 February)
• RE: Statements are now up (Wednesday, 9 February)
• RE: Imagining a Web Beyond the Browser (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Witness Statements for ADA/Internet Hearing (Wednesday, 9 February)
• RE: Oracle Beehive (Monday, 31 January)
• FW: Clinton/Gore: Electronic Government and Information Technolog y for Society (Tuesday, 4 January)
• RE: 1999 a Banner Year for Accessiblity-Ireland (Tuesday, 4 January)
• RE: 1999 a Banner Year for Accessiblity (Tuesday, 4 January)
• Article on Accessible Web Design (Monday, 3 January)
• RE: San Fran State University (Monday, 3 January)

Wayne Crotts

• RE: About ABBR (Saturday, 19 February)
• RE: [Fwd: INTERNET WORLD NEWS, February 09, 2000] (Thursday, 10 February)

Wayne Myers-Education

• RE: Media coverage monitoring [was: Re: Bill Frezza] (Thursday, 9 March)
• RE: Drop-down navigation boxes (fwd) (Monday, 14 February)
• RE: a site in scotland (Monday, 24 January)

Wendy A Chisholm

• Please review: Techniques For Evaluation And Implementation Of Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (Wednesday, 15 March)
• Survey says.... (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: Trouble with Judiciary live audio (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Fwd: * submission deadline extended to Tue 1 Feb 99 * (Monday, 24 January)

William Loughborough

• ally (Wednesday, 23 February)
• Re: ABBR vs. ACRONYM (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: Tool Tip behavior (was RE: About ABBR) (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Nielsen (Thursday, 17 February)
• [Fwd: [webwatch] How is access defined?] (Friday, 11 February)
• A Good Thing (Monday, 7 February)
• Re: WAI and the Feb 9. congressional hearing (Saturday, 5 February)
• Mac IE4.5 (Monday, 31 January)
• FCC (Monday, 24 January)
• A little good news (Saturday, 22 January)
• More on ADA threat (Wednesday, 19 January)
• ADA/WAI attack (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Banner year add-ons (Friday, 4 February)

Last message date: Friday, 31 March 2000 19:46:59 UTC