W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2000

Re: appache question answered

From: Thomas Dowling <tdowling@ohiolink.edu>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 09:27:51 -0500
Message-ID: <00cb01bf6809$ad9e99b0$711e99c0@ohiolink.edu>
To: "wai-ig list" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Poehlman" <poehlman@clark.net>
To: "wai-ig list" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2000 9:16 AM
Subject: appache question answered


> Thanks to all who responded to my muddled plea.
> I've got what I need.
> Too bad we can't use it in windows or at least my reading hasn't lead
> me that far.  Oh, I know, I can telnet or something but would like to
> see it running on my system without having to mount unix or lynnux to
> do it.
> bad spelling off.

There is a 32-bit Windows version of Apache: see
http://www.apache.org/docs/windows.html

The Apache developers point out that it performs better under Unix, but it
should be stable under Windows, or at least Windows NT.  They don't make
any claims about Windows 95 or Windows 98.

(And parenthetically, Apache was not named for the Native American tribe,
although I'm sure the developers enjoy the pun.  It's name derives from
its origins as a set of fixes and enhancements to the NCSA httpd,
resulting in A Patchy Server.)

Thomas Dowling
OhioLINK - Ohio Library and Information Network
tdowling@ohiolink.edu
Received on Wednesday, 26 January 2000 09:29:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:47 GMT