Re: Frames

You can also try various types of include - using SSI or PHP for example.
----- Original Message -----
From: Jonathan Chetwynd <jay@peepo.com>
To: Melinda Morris-Black <melinda@ink.org>; Accessibility Listserve
<w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2000 2:55 AM
Subject: Re: Frames


> If not frames what are the options?
>
> An alternative that is being tried offline is to include the navigation in
> its own table.
>
> Unfortunately this means that, for the moment it has to be included in
every
> page, increasing download marginally.
> (Else javascript, to include it but not every browser can use that)
> 'Object' is supposed to allow the use of external html,
> but is difficult to get the results desired
>
> jay@peepo.com
>
> Jonathan Chetwynd
> Special needs teacher / web accessibility consultant
> education and outreach working group member, web accessibility initiative,
> W3C
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Melinda Morris-Black <melinda@ink.org>
> To: Accessibility Listserve <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2000 10:06 PM
> Subject: Frames
>
>
> > Could someone please explain to me how a web page with frames "sounds"
> > to someone using voice assistive technologies? A web developer asked me
> > this question.
> >
> > Additionally, I'd appreciate a response that fully explains why frames
> > are not a good accessibility solution. Links to online documentation
> > would also suffice. I dislike frames for reasons separate from
> > accessibility, but want more ammo to rid them from existence! :)
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > MELINDA MORRIS-BLACK
> > Information Architect
> > Information Networks of Kansas
> > FON: (785) 296-5143
> > PCS: (785) 550-7345
> > FAX: (785) 296-5563
> > melinda@ink.org
> >
> >
>
>
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 16 February 2000 07:09:54 UTC